Code of Criminal Procedure Article 455-36
This English translation was last updated on 2020-01-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-05-13. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
The court may rule to reject the request if it deems that a separate pronouncement of confiscation is not in conformance with legal formalities, or if it should not be legally permitted, or if it is groundless. However, if the violation issue in the legal formalities can be rectified, the court shall set a time duration and order for such a rectification.The court shall rule to grant the request, if it deems that a separate pronouncement of confiscation is justified.The court rulings of interlocutory appeals, as described in the two preceding paragraphs, may be re-appealed.
中文原文 刑事訴訟法第455-36條
法院認為單獨宣告沒收之聲請不合法律上之程式或法律上不應准許或無理由者，應以裁定駁回之。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請單獨宣告沒收有理由者，應為准許之裁定。
對於前二項抗告法院之裁定，得提起再抗告。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請單獨宣告沒收有理由者，應為准許之裁定。
對於前二項抗告法院之裁定，得提起再抗告。