Labor Incident Act Article 29
This English translation was last updated on 2018-12-05, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-12-15. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
In addition tothe notice presented pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 3 of the preceding Article, the appropriate proposal should be delivered to the parties involved and other interested parties participating in the mediation.The parties involved and other interested parties participating in the mediation may raise objections within ten days of the peremptory period after the arrival of, or being informed of the content of the proposal, as described in the preceding paragraph. If objections are raised in conformity with the law within the period as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the mediation shall be deemed unsuccessful, and the court shall inform or otherwise notify the parties involved and other interested parties participating in the mediation. If no objections are raised in conformity with the lawwithin the allowed period, as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the mediation shall be deemed successful under the aforementionedproposal. If the mediation is unsuccessful, as prescribed in the provisions of the preceding paragraph, unless the mediation movant submits an objection to the court concerning the continuation of litigation proceedings within ten days of the peremptory period after being informed of the mediation results, the case shall continue in litigation proceedings, and it shall be deemed that the action is initiated when the motion for mediation is filed. This provision also applies to cases where an action is initiated prior to the arrival of the appropriate proposal, as mentioned in the first paragraph.For those cases where initiating an action is deemed a motion for mediation,all effects resulting from the original initiation of the action shall remain in effect.The judge who participates in the labor mediation committee shall also preside over the same case as it continues in litigation proceedings, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 勞動事件法第29條
除依前條第三項規定告知者外,適當方案應送達於當事人及參加調解之利害關係人。
當事人或參加調解之利害關係人,對於前項方案,得於送達或受告知日後十日之不變期間內,提出異議。
於前項期間內合法提出異議者,視為調解不成立,法院並應告知或通知當事人及參加調解之利害關係人;未於前項期間內合法提出異議者,視為已依該方案成立調解。
依前項規定調解不成立者,除調解聲請人於受告知或通知後十日之不變期間內,向法院為反對續行訴訟程序之意思外,應續行訴訟程序,並視為自調解聲請時,已經起訴;其於第一項適當方案送達前起訴者,亦同。
以起訴視為調解者,仍自起訴時發生訴訟繫屬之效力。
依前項情形續行訴訟程序者,由參與勞動調解委員會之法官為之。
當事人或參加調解之利害關係人,對於前項方案,得於送達或受告知日後十日之不變期間內,提出異議。
於前項期間內合法提出異議者,視為調解不成立,法院並應告知或通知當事人及參加調解之利害關係人;未於前項期間內合法提出異議者,視為已依該方案成立調解。
依前項規定調解不成立者,除調解聲請人於受告知或通知後十日之不變期間內,向法院為反對續行訴訟程序之意思外,應續行訴訟程序,並視為自調解聲請時,已經起訴;其於第一項適當方案送達前起訴者,亦同。
以起訴視為調解者,仍自起訴時發生訴訟繫屬之效力。
依前項情形續行訴訟程序者,由參與勞動調解委員會之法官為之。