The Compulsory Enforcement Act Article 77-1
To investigate the situations in Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 of the preceding Article or other related right and relationship, the enforcement judge or clerk may carry it out in the following manners:1. Open the door lock to enter into the immovable property or interrogate the debtor or the third party in possession of the property, and order them to submit the relevant documents;2. Investigate the police and other related authorities and groups, and the respondents may not refuse.In situations described in the preceding paragraph, where the debtor refuses to make a statement or submit relevant documents without a justifiable reason or makes a false statement or submits false documents, the enforcement court may, upon the creditor's petition or on its own authority, place the debtor into custody; however, placing the debtor in custody is not permitted where the enforcement court does not interrogate the debtor and finds it manifestly difficult to ascertain the status of the immovable property without placing the debtor into custody.Where the third party is in the circumstances prescribed in the preceding paragraph or refuses to appear, the enforcement court may impose a fine of no more than NTD 15,000 by a ruling.
中文原文 強制執行法第77-1條
執行法官或書記官,為調查前條第一項第二款情事或其他權利關係,得依下列方式行之:
一、開啟門鎖進入不動產或訊問債務人或占有之第三人,並得命其提出有關文書。
二、向警察及其他有關機關、團體調查,受調查者不得拒絕。
前項情形,債務人無正當理由拒絕陳述或提出文書,或為虛偽陳述或提出虛偽之文書者,執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權管收債務人。
但未經訊問債務人,並認非予管收,顯難查明不動產狀況者,不得為之。
第三人有前項情形或拒絕到場者,執行法院得以裁定處新臺幣一萬五千元以下之罰鍰。
一、開啟門鎖進入不動產或訊問債務人或占有之第三人,並得命其提出有關文書。
二、向警察及其他有關機關、團體調查,受調查者不得拒絕。
前項情形,債務人無正當理由拒絕陳述或提出文書,或為虛偽陳述或提出虛偽之文書者,執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權管收債務人。
但未經訊問債務人,並認非予管收,顯難查明不動產狀況者,不得為之。
第三人有前項情形或拒絕到場者,執行法院得以裁定處新臺幣一萬五千元以下之罰鍰。