The Compulsory Enforcement Act Article 22
Where the debtor is in one of the following situations, the enforcement court may, upon the creditor's petition or on its own authority, order the debtor to furnish a security or perform his/her obligations within a time limit: 1. The facts sufficiently support that the debtor is able to perform his/her obligation but intentionally refuses to perform it.2. The debtor is found to conceal or dispose the property subject to the compulsory enforcement.Where the debtor is in one of the situations prescribed in any of the subparagraphs of the preceding paragraph, and the facts sufficiently support that the debtor is likely to flee or hide or for any other necessary reasons, the enforcement court may, upon the creditor's petition or on its own authority, restrict the debtor's living quarters to a limited area, provided that the restriction shall be removed if the debtor has furnished an adequate security, the reason for the restriction has been extinguished, or the enforcement has been concluded.The restriction of the living quarters and its removal prescribed in the preceding paragraph shall be notified to the debtor and related authorities. Where a debtor violates the order restricting his/her living quarters prescribed in paragraph 2 without any justifiable reason, the enforcement court may arrest him/her.Where the debtor fails to furnish the security or perform its obligations within a time limit in accordance with an order pursuant to paragraph 1 or violates the order restricting his/her living quarters pursuant to paragraph 2 without a justifiable reason, the enforcement court may, upon the creditor's petition or on its own authority, place the debtor into custody, provided that placing the debtor into custody is not permitted if the enforcement court does not interrogate the debtor and finds it manifestly difficult to proceed with the compulsory enforcement without placing the debtor into custody.Where a debtor appears through an arrest, notification, or on his or her own, and the associate judicial officer finds, after questioning, that the above situations apply and placing the debtor into custody is necessary, it shall report and request the enforcement court to carry it out pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 強制執行法第22條
債務人有下列情形之一者，執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權命其提供擔保或限期履行：
一、有事實足認顯有履行義務之可能故不履行。
二、就應供強制執行之財產有隱匿或處分之情事。
債務人有前項各款情形之一，而有事實足認顯有逃匿之虞或其他必要事由者，執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權，限制債務人住居於一定之地域。
但債務人已提供相當擔保、限制住居原因消滅或執行完結者，應解除其限制。
前項限制住居及其解除，應通知債務人及有關機關。
債務人無正當理由違反第二項限制住居命令者，執行法院得拘提之。
債務人未依第一項命令提供相當擔保、遵期履行或無正當理由違反第二項限制住居命令者，執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權管收債務人。
但未經訊問債務人，並認非予管收，顯難進行強制執行程序者，不得為之。
債務人經拘提、通知或自行到場，司法事務官於詢問後，認有前項事由，而有管收之必要者，應報請執行法院依前項規定辦理。
一、有事實足認顯有履行義務之可能故不履行。
二、就應供強制執行之財產有隱匿或處分之情事。
債務人有前項各款情形之一，而有事實足認顯有逃匿之虞或其他必要事由者，執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權，限制債務人住居於一定之地域。
但債務人已提供相當擔保、限制住居原因消滅或執行完結者，應解除其限制。
前項限制住居及其解除，應通知債務人及有關機關。
債務人無正當理由違反第二項限制住居命令者，執行法院得拘提之。
債務人未依第一項命令提供相當擔保、遵期履行或無正當理由違反第二項限制住居命令者，執行法院得依債權人聲請或依職權管收債務人。
但未經訊問債務人，並認非予管收，顯難進行強制執行程序者，不得為之。
債務人經拘提、通知或自行到場，司法事務官於詢問後，認有前項事由，而有管收之必要者，應報請執行法院依前項規定辦理。