Commercial Case Adjudication Act Article 7
Unless otherwise prescribed, agents ad litem shall represent the party for all acts of proceedings in court involving commercial cases.If the parties, or related parties, fail to hire agents ad litem in accordance with the provisions of the preceding article, or if they have hired the said agents in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2 of the preceding article, but the court deems inappropriate, they shall be ordered to make corrections within a designated period of time.If the petitioners, the plaintiffs, the appellants or the interlocutory appellants fail to make corrections within the prescribed time limit, or they fail to retain a lawyer as the agent ad litem, in accordance with Paragraph 3 of the preceding article, the court shall rule to dismiss the petition, action, appeal or interlocutory appeal. If the action is initiated as a petition for mediation, the court shall rule to dismiss the action.When the parties, or related parties, make corrections in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2, their procedural act, after having a retroactive endorsement from their agents ad litem, shall take effect at the time of the act. However, this rule does not apply if the corrections are made beyond the designated period of time.
中文原文 商業事件審理法第7條
商業事件,除別有規定外,應由程序代理人為程序行為。
當事人或關係人未依前條規定委任程序代理人,或雖依前條第二項規定委任,法院認為不適當者,應先定期命補正。
聲請人、原告、上訴人或抗告人逾期未補正亦未依前條第三項為聲請選任律師為其程序代理人者,法院應以裁定駁回其聲請、起訴、上訴或抗告。
以起訴視為調解之聲請者,法院應以裁定駁回其起訴。
當事人或關係人依第二項規定補正者,其程序行為經程序代理人追認,溯及於行為時發生效力。
但逾期補正者,不在此限。
當事人或關係人未依前條規定委任程序代理人,或雖依前條第二項規定委任,法院認為不適當者,應先定期命補正。
聲請人、原告、上訴人或抗告人逾期未補正亦未依前條第三項為聲請選任律師為其程序代理人者,法院應以裁定駁回其聲請、起訴、上訴或抗告。
以起訴視為調解之聲請者,法院應以裁定駁回其起訴。
當事人或關係人依第二項規定補正者,其程序行為經程序代理人追認,溯及於行為時發生效力。
但逾期補正者,不在此限。