Commercial Case Adjudication Act Article 64

When petitioning for a temporary status quo injunction, the petitioner should clarify the fact that it is necessary for purposes of preventing material harm or imminent danger, or other similar circumstances. If such a clarification is insufficient, the court shall dismiss the petition.Where the petitioner has already clarified the situation, the court may still order the petitioner to provide a security for a temporary status quo injunction.Before issuing a temporary status quo injunction, the parties shall be given the opportunity to state their cases before the court. However, the rule does not apply, if the petitioner claims that there are special circumstances preventing the opposing parties being notified before the injunction is issued, and definitive evidence is presented that the court deems appropriate.If the petitioner fails to initiate an action within thirty days after a temporary status quo injunction is served, the court may, on a petition or ex officio, revoke said injunction.A ruling of revocation prescribed in the preceding paragraph shall be publicly announced, and such a ruling shall take effect at the time of announcement.
中文原文 商業事件審理法第64條
聲請定暫時狀態處分時,聲請人就有爭執之法律關係及防止發生重大之損害或避免急迫之危險或有其他相類之情形而有必要之事實,應釋明之;其釋明有不足者,法院應駁回聲請。
聲請人雖已釋明,法院仍得命其供擔保後為定暫時狀態處分。
法院為定暫時狀態處分前,應使當事人有陳述意見之機會。
但聲請人主張有不能於處分前通知相對人陳述之特殊情事,並提出確實之證據,經法院認為適當者,不在此限。
聲請人自定暫時狀態處分送達之日起三十日內未起訴者,法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷之。
前項撤銷裁定應公告之,於公告時生效。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.