Commercial Case Adjudication Act Article 61
The court may inquire among the parties about the possibility of settling, transferring the case to mediation, or submitting the case to arbitration to resolve disputes when appropriate and to promote alternative dispute resolutions other than litigation for the parties.If the parties enter into an arbitration agreement in writing during the proceedings, or such an agreement is clearly recorded in the transcript, the court shall order, on a petition or ex officio, to stay the proceedings and order the plaintiff to submit the case to arbitration within a designated period of time. However, this rule does not apply to the cases where the oral argument is already concluded.If the plaintiff fails to submit the case to arbitration within the said time period, as described in the preceding paragraph, the court shall rule to dismiss the case.In the case, as described in Paragraph 2, if an arbitration is established after the court has ruled to stay the litigation proceedings, the litigation proceedings are deemed concluded when the arbitral tribunal reaches an award. If no award is reached, the court may, on a petition or ex officio, revoke the order of the stay of the litigation proceedings.If a settlement is reached, or if the case is deemed as concluded, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the parties may, within three months from the date the settlement is reached, or the date original arbitral award is served, move for a refund of the balance of the filing fee paid, after deducting one-fourth of the court costs. If the arbitration award made by the arbitration tribunal is revoked by the court's ruling, the parties may request the continuation of the trial and pay back the refunded court costs, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph.The provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 500 and the main text of Paragraph 2 of Article 501, Article 502, and Article 506 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the situation as described in the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 商業事件審理法第61條
法院得適時探詢當事人和解、移付調解或提付仲裁解決紛爭之可能，促使當事人依訴訟外之方式解決紛爭。
當事人於訴訟進行中以書面訂立仲裁協議或協議經記明筆錄者，法院應依聲請或依職權裁定停止訴訟程序，並命原告於一定期間內提付仲裁。
但已言詞辯論終結者，不在此限。
原告逾前項期間未提付仲裁者，法院應以裁定駁回其訴。
第二項之訴訟，經法院裁定停止訴訟程序後，如仲裁成立，視為於仲裁庭作成判斷時訴訟終結；如不能作成判斷，法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷停止訴訟之裁定。
訴訟上和解成立或依前項視為訴訟終結者，當事人得自和解成立之日或受送達仲裁判斷書正本之日起三個月內，聲請退還扣除應繳裁判費四分之一後之餘額。
仲裁庭作成之仲裁判斷經法院判決撤銷確定者，當事人得請求繼續審判，並繳納前項所退還之裁判費。
民事訴訟法第五百條第一項、第二項本文、第五百零一條、第五百零二條、第五百零六條規定，於前項情形準用之。
當事人於訴訟進行中以書面訂立仲裁協議或協議經記明筆錄者，法院應依聲請或依職權裁定停止訴訟程序，並命原告於一定期間內提付仲裁。
但已言詞辯論終結者，不在此限。
原告逾前項期間未提付仲裁者，法院應以裁定駁回其訴。
第二項之訴訟，經法院裁定停止訴訟程序後，如仲裁成立，視為於仲裁庭作成判斷時訴訟終結；如不能作成判斷，法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷停止訴訟之裁定。
訴訟上和解成立或依前項視為訴訟終結者，當事人得自和解成立之日或受送達仲裁判斷書正本之日起三個月內，聲請退還扣除應繳裁判費四分之一後之餘額。
仲裁庭作成之仲裁判斷經法院判決撤銷確定者，當事人得請求繼續審判，並繳納前項所退還之裁判費。
民事訴訟法第五百條第一項、第二項本文、第五百零一條、第五百零二條、第五百零六條規定，於前項情形準用之。