Code of Civil Procedure Article 485
No appeal may be taken from a ruling issued by a commissioned judge or an assigned judge. Notwithstanding, where such ruling is the kind of ruling from which an appeal may be taken if it were made by the court hearing the case, an objection to such ruling may be raised with the same court.The provisions with regard to appeals from rulings of the same kind shall apply mutatis mutandis to the objection provided in the preceding paragraph.An appeal may be taken from the ruling on an objection made by the court hearing the case in accordance with the provisions of this Part.Where the action is pending in the court of third instance, objections to rulings made by the commissioned judge or assigned judge may be raised with the court of third instance. In cases where an appeal may be taken to the court of third instance, objections to rulings made by the commissioned judge or assigned judge of the court of second instance may be raised with the court hearing the case.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第485條
受命法官或受託法官之裁定,不得抗告。
但其裁定如係受訴法院所為而依法得為抗告者,得向受訴法院提出異議。
前項異議,準用對於法院同種裁定抗告之規定。
受訴法院就異議所為之裁定,得依本編之規定抗告。
訴訟繫屬於第三審法院者,其受命法官或受託法官所為之裁定,得向第三審法院提出異議。
不得上訴於第三審法院之事件,第二審法院受命法官或受託法官所為之裁定,得向受訴法院提出異議。
但其裁定如係受訴法院所為而依法得為抗告者,得向受訴法院提出異議。
前項異議,準用對於法院同種裁定抗告之規定。
受訴法院就異議所為之裁定,得依本編之規定抗告。
訴訟繫屬於第三審法院者,其受命法官或受託法官所為之裁定,得向第三審法院提出異議。
不得上訴於第三審法院之事件,第二審法院受命法官或受託法官所為之裁定,得向受訴法院提出異議。