Code of Civil Procedure Article 484
In cases where an appeal may not be taken to the court of third instance, no appeals may be taken from a ruling made by the court of second instance. Notwithstanding, an objection to any of the following rulings may be raised with the original court: 1. A ruling ordering the court clerk, executive officer, statutory agent, or advocate to bear the litigation expenses;2. A ruling for imposing fines upon a witness, an expert witness, interpreter or a third person who holds documents or objects which should be inspected;3. A ruling for denying a refusal to give testimony, expert testimony, or interpretation;4. A ruling for compulsory production of documents or objects which should be inspected. The provisions with regard to appeals from rulings of the same kind shall apply mutatis mutandis to the objection provided in the preceding paragraph. The ruling on an objection made by the court hearing the case is not reviewable.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第484條
不得上訴於第三審法院之事件，其第二審法院所為裁定，不得抗告。
但下列裁定，得向原法院提出異議：
一、命法院書記官、執達員、法定代理人、訴訟代理人負擔訴訟費用之裁定。
二、對證人、鑑定人、通譯或執有文書、勘驗物之第三人處以罰鍰之裁定。
三、駁回拒絕證言、拒絕鑑定、拒絕通譯之裁定。
四、強制提出文書、勘驗物之裁定。
前項異議，準用對於法院同種裁定抗告之規定。
受訴法院就異議所為之裁定，不得聲明不服。
但下列裁定，得向原法院提出異議：
一、命法院書記官、執達員、法定代理人、訴訟代理人負擔訴訟費用之裁定。
二、對證人、鑑定人、通譯或執有文書、勘驗物之第三人處以罰鍰之裁定。
三、駁回拒絕證言、拒絕鑑定、拒絕通譯之裁定。
四、強制提出文書、勘驗物之裁定。
前項異議，準用對於法院同種裁定抗告之規定。
受訴法院就異議所為之裁定，不得聲明不服。