Code of Civil Procedure Article 415-1
In the mediation of disputes over proprietary rights, with the consent of both parties, the mediators may, in their discretion, propose the terms of mediation.Except as otherwise agreed-upon by the parties, the terms of a mediation provided in the preceding paragraph shall be determined by the majority of the mediators.Where the mediators are unable to determine the proposed terms of the mediation in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the judge may, with the consent of both parties, determine the proposed terms or designate another mediation session or deem the mediation unsuccessful.The terms of the mediation proposed by the mediators shall be made either in a writing bearing the date, or shall be indicated in the mediation proceeding transcript by the court clerk, signed by the mediators, and forwarded to the judge for review and approval. After the judge approves the proposed terms, the mediation shall be deemed successful.The writing of the approved proposed terms of the mediation provided in the preceding paragraph shall serve as the mediation proceeding transcript.Where the judge proposes the mediation terms, the mediation shall be deemed successful upon entry of such terms in the mediation proceeding transcript by the court clerk.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第415-1條
關於財產權爭議之調解,經兩造同意,得由調解委員酌定解決事件之調解條款。
前項調解條款之酌定,除兩造另有約定外,以調解委員過半數定之。
調解委員不能依前項規定酌定調解條款時,法官得於徵詢兩造同意後,酌定調解條款,或另定調解期日,或視為調解不成立。
調解委員酌定之調解條款,應作成書面,記明年月日,或由書記官記明於調解程序筆錄,由調解委員簽名後,送請法官審核;其經法官核定者,視為調解成立。
前項經核定之記載調解條款之書面,視為調解程序筆錄。
法官酌定之調解條款,於書記官記明於調解程序筆錄時,視為調解成立。
前項調解條款之酌定,除兩造另有約定外,以調解委員過半數定之。
調解委員不能依前項規定酌定調解條款時,法官得於徵詢兩造同意後,酌定調解條款,或另定調解期日,或視為調解不成立。
調解委員酌定之調解條款,應作成書面,記明年月日,或由書記官記明於調解程序筆錄,由調解委員簽名後,送請法官審核;其經法官核定者,視為調解成立。
前項經核定之記載調解條款之書面,視為調解程序筆錄。
法官酌定之調解條款,於書記官記明於調解程序筆錄時,視為調解成立。