Code of Civil Procedure Article 233
Where there is any omission in the decision either with regard to a part of the claim or with regard to litigation expenses, the court shall, on motion or on its own initiative, supplement its decision by another judgment.An appeal against the omission in the judgment shall be deemed a motion for a supplemental judgment.Where the oral argument concerning the omitted part has been concluded, the court shall promptly enter a supplemental judgment; where such oral argument has not been concluded, the presiding judge shall promptly designate a date for the relevant oral argument.In case of a supplemental judgment entered for the omission of a decision on litigation expenses, where an appeal has been legally taken from a judgment on the merits, the appellate court shall adjudicate the supplemental judgment and the judgment on the merits jointly.A ruling shall be issued when denying a motion for a supplemental judgment.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第233條
訴訟標的之一部或訴訟費用，裁判有脫漏者，法院應依聲請或依職權以判決補充之。
當事人就脫漏部分聲明不服者，以聲請補充判決論。
脫漏之部分已經辯論終結者，應即為判決；未終結者，審判長應速定言詞辯論期日。
因訴訟費用裁判脫漏所為之補充判決，於本案判決有合法之上訴時，上訴審法院應與本案訴訟同為裁判。
駁回補充判決之聲請，以裁定為之。
當事人就脫漏部分聲明不服者，以聲請補充判決論。
脫漏之部分已經辯論終結者，應即為判決；未終結者，審判長應速定言詞辯論期日。
因訴訟費用裁判脫漏所為之補充判決，於本案判決有合法之上訴時，上訴審法院應與本案訴訟同為裁判。
駁回補充判決之聲請，以裁定為之。