Code of Civil Procedure Article 182-1
When a civil court determines that it has no jurisdiction over an action that is transferred by the administrative court, the civil court shall stay the proceeding by a ruling and petition to the Supreme Court to appoint the court with jurisdiction to adjudicate the action, except in one of the following circumstances:(1) When the transfer has been decided by a final and binding decision of the Supreme Administrative Court; or(2) When the parties consent that the action shall be adjudicated by the civil court.The consent in the second sub-paragraph of the preceding paragraph should be recorded in the transcript or evidenced with a written document.The Supreme Court shall grant the parties an opportunity to be heard before issuing a ruling on the petition pursuant to the first paragraph of this Article.Where the civil court has issued a judgment regarding an action transferred by the administrative court, an appellate court shall not reverse the judgment for reason of lack of jurisdiction.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第182-1條
普通法院就行政法院移送之訴訟認無審判權者,應以裁定停止訴訟程序,並請求最高法院指定有審判權之管轄法院。
但有下列情形之一者,不在此限:
一、移送經最高行政法院裁判確定。
二、當事人合意願由普通法院裁判。
前項第二款之合意,應記明筆錄或以文書證之。
最高法院就第一項請求為裁定前,應使當事人有陳述意見之機會。
普通法院就行政法院移送之訴訟為裁判者,上級審法院不得以其無審判權而廢棄之。
但有下列情形之一者,不在此限:
一、移送經最高行政法院裁判確定。
二、當事人合意願由普通法院裁判。
前項第二款之合意,應記明筆錄或以文書證之。
最高法院就第一項請求為裁定前,應使當事人有陳述意見之機會。
普通法院就行政法院移送之訴訟為裁判者,上級審法院不得以其無審判權而廢棄之。