Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 15
(Filing and Screening of Petition Briefs)The petition brief must be filed with the Constitutional Court in writing and include the particulars as required by this Act together with relevant evidence and supporting documents.Where any of the circumstances below arises, the Chamber may dismiss the petition under the preceding Paragraph by a unanimous order, provided that when the pleading's defect is corrigible, the presiding Justice of the relevant Chamber shall require the petitioner to rectify it within a specified period of time:(1) the petitioner lacks the capacity to be a party;(2) the petitioner is not legally represented by her or his statutory agent, representative, or administrator to conduct acts of litigation;(3) the petition is lodged by an advocate who lacks the authority;(4) the petition is lodged after the expiry of procedural time limits;(5) the petition is lodged for matters that are explicitly excluded from petition or re-petition by this Act; (6) the petition challenges the decisions of the Constitutional Court or the Chambers thereof; or (7) the petition is not lodged in the prescribed form, or not in conformity with other requirements.In the case that the petition brief does not state the grounds for adjudication, the Chamber may dismiss the petition by a unanimous order without first requiring it to be rectified.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第15條
聲請憲法法庭裁判，應以聲請書記載本法規定之應記載事項，並附具相關佐證資料提出於憲法法庭。
前項聲請，有下列各款情形之一者，審查庭得以一致決裁定不受理。
但其情形可以補正者，審判長應定期間命其補正：
一、聲請人無當事人能力。
二、聲請人未由合法之法定代理人、代表人或管理人為訴訟行為。
三、由訴訟代理人聲請，而其代理權有欠缺。
四、聲請逾越法定期限。
五、本法明定不得聲請或不得更行聲請之事項。
六、對憲法法庭或審查庭之裁判聲明不服。
七、聲請不合程式或不備其他要件。
聲請書未表明聲請裁判之理由者，毋庸命其補正，審查庭得以一致決裁定不受理。
前項聲請，有下列各款情形之一者，審查庭得以一致決裁定不受理。
但其情形可以補正者，審判長應定期間命其補正：
一、聲請人無當事人能力。
二、聲請人未由合法之法定代理人、代表人或管理人為訴訟行為。
三、由訴訟代理人聲請，而其代理權有欠缺。
四、聲請逾越法定期限。
五、本法明定不得聲請或不得更行聲請之事項。
六、對憲法法庭或審查庭之裁判聲明不服。
七、聲請不合程式或不備其他要件。
聲請書未表明聲請裁判之理由者，毋庸命其補正，審查庭得以一致決裁定不受理。