The Administrative Court Organization Act Article 16-1

The applicability of precedent cases compiled by the Supreme Administrative Court prior to the enactment of the amendment of this Act, on December 7, 2018, should be suspended, if the full text of the judgment is not available for reference.The precedents, in which the applicability has not been suspended prior to the stipulation of the preceding paragraph, have the same effect as the Supreme Administrative Court judgments that have not been selected as precedents.Within three years after the implementation of the amended Act on December 7, 2018, if there is doubt, that the precedents, or resolutions, on which the final and binding judgment of the people's case is based, are contradictory to the Constitution, the people may file a motion for Constitutional interpretations pursuant to the provisions of Article 5 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 of the Judicial Yuan Justices Reviewing Cases Act.
中文原文 行政法院組織法第16-1條
最高行政法院於中華民國一百零七年十二月七日本法修正施行前依法選編之判例,若無裁判全文可資查考者,應停止適用。
未經前項規定停止適用之判例,其效力與未經選編為判例之最高行政法院裁判相同。
於中華民國一百零七年十二月七日本法修正之條文施行後三年內,人民於上開條文施行後所受確定終局裁判援用之判例、決議,發生牴觸憲法之疑義者,得準用司法院大法官審理案件法第五條第一項第二款之規定聲請解釋憲法。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.