National Communications Commission Regulations for Subsidizing the Promotion of Innovation and Research of the Communications Industry Article 9
The subsidy approval standards and operating procedures shall be conducted according to below regulations:1. The Commission shall first review and approve the applicant’s qualifications, application form, project plan and prerequisite documents. Should the any of above criteria be found to be incomplete, the Commission shall notify the applicant to undertake corrective action within a prescribed period. If an applicant fails to do so, the application shall be rejected.2. The Commission will hold review meeting to review the project proposed by the applicant. The review meeting shall, depends on its actual needs, notify the applicant to attend the meeting to state its / his / her opinions or to provide explanations.3. Members of the review meeting shall provide opinions towards abovementioned project according to below review items and standards:(1) Connection with the Commission’s regulatory duties.(2) Implementation feasibility.(3) Justifiability of the budget allocation.(4) Appropriateness of manpower allocation.(5) Possibility of expected results or benefits.(6) Appropriateness of the performance index.4. After the opinions are provided through the review meeting, the project shall be submitted to the Commission’s committee for approval.5. The budget of the approved project shall be approved by the Commission and the Commission shall sign the contract with the applicant accordingly.
中文原文 國家通訊傳播委員會推動通訊傳播產業創新研究發展補助辦法第9條
補助案件之審核基準及作業程序應依下列規定辦理：
一、由本會先就申請人資格、申請書、計畫書及應備文件進行檢核，倘有未符合規定且可補正者，本會得通知限期補正；屆期未補正或補正不全者，不予受理。
二、為審查申請人所提計畫，由本會召開審查會議；審查會議並得依實際需求，通知申請人到會陳述意見或提出說明。
三、前款計畫由審查委員依下列審查項目及基準提供意見：
（一）與本會業務職掌範圍之關聯性。
（二）執行之可行性。
（三）經費分配之合理性。
（四）人力配置之妥適性。
（五）預期成果或效益之可能性。
（六）績效衡量指標之適當性。
四、計畫經由審查會議提供意見後，提請本會委員會議決定之。
五、經本會審核通過之計畫，由本會核定經費後，與申請人簽訂契約。
一、由本會先就申請人資格、申請書、計畫書及應備文件進行檢核，倘有未符合規定且可補正者，本會得通知限期補正；屆期未補正或補正不全者，不予受理。
二、為審查申請人所提計畫，由本會召開審查會議；審查會議並得依實際需求，通知申請人到會陳述意見或提出說明。
三、前款計畫由審查委員依下列審查項目及基準提供意見：
（一）與本會業務職掌範圍之關聯性。
（二）執行之可行性。
（三）經費分配之合理性。
（四）人力配置之妥適性。
（五）預期成果或效益之可能性。
（六）績效衡量指標之適當性。
四、計畫經由審查會議提供意見後，提請本會委員會議決定之。
五、經本會審核通過之計畫，由本會核定經費後，與申請人簽訂契約。