Financial Consumer Protection Act Article 30
A financial consumer may, within a peremptory period of 90 days, counting from the day on which the ombudsman case achieves a resolution, apply for the ombudsman body to send the ombudsman statement to a court for approval. Within five days of the aforementioned date on which the application is entertained, the ombudsman body shall send the ombudsman statement and the associated case files for approval by the district court with jurisdiction in the locality where the offices of the ombudsman body are located; however, prior to the sending to the court for approval, if the financial services enterprise has already implemented the contents of the decision, it will be exempted from the requirement to request court approval.Except where the circumstances contemplated in paragraph 3 exist, the court shall approve the ombudsman statement of the preceding paragraph. After granting approval, the court shall return the approved ombudsman statement and the associated ombudsman case files to the ombudsman body, and shall also have originals of the approved ombudsman statement served upon the parties to the dispute and upon their counsel.Where the court withholds approval because the content of the ombudsman statement violates laws or regulations, contravenes public order or good morals, or its compulsory enforcement is not possible for some other reason, then the court shall provide notice of its reasons to the ombudsman body and the parties to the dispute.An ombudsman statement that has been approved by a court in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2 shall have the same force as a final and irrevocable civil judgment, and the parties to the dispute shall not again in connection with the ombudsman case institute legal proceedings, nor shall it file a complaint or apply to institute an ombudsman case under this Act.Where there are legal grounds to consider a court-approved ombudsman statement invalid or voidable, a party to the dispute may file suit in the district court of jurisdiction to request that the ombudsman case be declared invalid or void.The situation contemplated in the preceding paragraph is subject mutatis mutandis to the provisions of Articles 500 to 502 and Article 506 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure and Article 18, paragraph 2 of the Compulsory Execution Act.
中文原文 金融消費者保護法第30條
金融消費者得於評議成立之日起九十日之不變期間內,申請爭議處理機構將評議書送請法院核可。
爭議處理機構應於受理前述申請之日起五日內,將評議書及卷證送請爭議處理機構事務所所在地之管轄地方法院核可。
但爭議處理機構送請法院核可前,金融服務業已依評議成立之內容完全履行者,免送請核可。
除有第三項情形外,法院對於前項之評議書應予核可。
法院核可後,應將經核可之評議書併同評議事件卷證發還爭議處理機構,並將經核可之評議書以正本送達當事人及其代理人。
法院因評議書內容牴觸法令、違背公共秩序或善良風俗或有其他不能強制執行之原因而未予核可者,法院應將其理由通知爭議處理機構及當事人。
評議書依第二項規定經法院核可者,與民事確定判決有同一之效力,當事人就該事件不得再行起訴或依本法申訴、申請評議。
評議書經法院核可後,依法有無效或得撤銷之原因者,當事人得向管轄地方法院提起宣告評議無效或撤銷評議之訴。
前項情形,準用民事訴訟法第五百條至第五百零二條及第五百零六條、強制執行法第十八條第二項規定。
爭議處理機構應於受理前述申請之日起五日內,將評議書及卷證送請爭議處理機構事務所所在地之管轄地方法院核可。
但爭議處理機構送請法院核可前,金融服務業已依評議成立之內容完全履行者,免送請核可。
除有第三項情形外,法院對於前項之評議書應予核可。
法院核可後,應將經核可之評議書併同評議事件卷證發還爭議處理機構,並將經核可之評議書以正本送達當事人及其代理人。
法院因評議書內容牴觸法令、違背公共秩序或善良風俗或有其他不能強制執行之原因而未予核可者,法院應將其理由通知爭議處理機構及當事人。
評議書依第二項規定經法院核可者,與民事確定判決有同一之效力,當事人就該事件不得再行起訴或依本法申訴、申請評議。
評議書經法院核可後,依法有無效或得撤銷之原因者,當事人得向管轄地方法院提起宣告評議無效或撤銷評議之訴。
前項情形,準用民事訴訟法第五百條至第五百零二條及第五百零六條、強制執行法第十八條第二項規定。