Securities Investor and Futures Trader Protection Act Article 10-1

When the protection institution discovers on the part of a director or supervisor of an exchange-listed, OTC-listed, or emerging stock company any violation of Article 20, paragraph 1 or 2, Article 155, paragraph 1 or 2, or Article 157-1, paragraph 1 or 2 of the Securities and Exchange Act or Article 106 to Article 108, paragraph 1 of the Futures Trading Act, or any circumstances under Securities and Exchange Act Article 32, paragraph 1 and there is no grounds of exemption from liability under paragraph 2 of the same article, or any circumstances under Securities and Exchange Act Article 171, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 or 3, or any conduct in the course of performing duties that is materially injurious to the company or is in violation of laws, regulations, or provisions of the company's articles of incorporation, it may handle the matter in accordance with the following provisions:1. The protection institution may, in writing, request the supervisors of the company to institute an action against the director on behalf of the company, or request the board of directors of the company to institute an action against the supervisor on behalf of the company or request the company to institute an action against a former director or supervisor. If the supervisors, the board of directors, or the company fail to institute an action within 30 days after receiving the request made by the protection institution, then the protection institution may institute the action on behalf of the company without regard to the restrictions of Article 214, or of Article 214 as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 227, of the Company Act.2. The protection institution may institute an action petitioning a court for a judgment or ruling discharging the given director or supervisor without regard to the restrictions of Article 200, or of Article 200 as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 227, of the Company Act, and the causes for such discharge shall not be limited to causes occurring during the term of office coinciding with the time the action is instituted.The right to institute an action petitioning a court for discharge of a director or supervisor under subparagraph 2 of the preceding paragraph shall be extinguished if not exercised within 2 years from the time the protection institution learns there is cause for discharge, or when 10 years have elapsed from the time of occurrence of the cause for discharge.The provisions of Articles 34 through 36 apply mutatis mutandis when the protection institution, pursuant to paragraph 1, institutes an action or an appeal or moves for an injunctive or executory proceeding.When the company's exchange listing, OTC listing, or emerging stock registration is terminated for any reason, the protection institution may still apply the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs to any circumstance of paragraph 1 that occurred during the company's period of listing or emerging stock registration.When the protection institution institutes an action under paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, any person who should bear liability for compensation for the same basic facts and who has or had the authority to manage affairs of the company or to sign on behalf of the company may be joined or added to the action. The same shall apply even if the person's professional relationship with the company no longer exists.When a company supervisor, the board of directors, or the company institutes an action under paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, the protection institution, to defend the rights and interests of the company and the shareholders, may intervene in the action while it is pending, and the provisions of Article 56, paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis.When a director or supervisor is discharged by a final and binding court judgment or ruling under paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, the person may not, within 3 years from the date that the judgment or ruling becomes final and binding, serve as a director or supervisor of an exchange-listed, OTC-listed, or emerging stock company or as a designated natural person representing such a director or supervisor in the exercise of duties under Article 27, paragraph 1 of the Company Act. If already serving in such a capacity, he or she shall ipso facto be discharged.After a judgment or ruling for discharge under paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 has become final and unappealable, the competent authority shall issue an official letter requesting the competent authority in charge of company registration to carry out registration of the discharge.If the company has duly established an audit committee, the term "supervisor" as used in paragraph 1 and paragraph 6 shall be taken to mean the audit committee or its independent director members.
中文原文 證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法第10-1條
保護機構辦理前條第一項業務,發現上市、上櫃或興櫃公司之董事或監察人,有證券交易法第一百五十五條、第一百五十七條之一或期貨交易法第一百零六條至第一百零八條規定之情事,或執行業務有重大損害公司之行為或違反法令或章程之重大事項,得依下列規定辦理:
一、以書面請求公司之監察人為公司對董事提起訴訟,或請求公司之董事會為公司對監察人提起訴訟,或請求公司對已卸任之董事或監察人提起訴訟。
監察人、董事會或公司自保護機構請求之日起三十日內不提起訴訟時,保護機構得為公司提起訴訟,不受公司法第二百十四條及第二百二十七條準用第二百十四條之限制。
二、訴請法院裁判解任公司之董事或監察人,不受公司法第二百條及第二百二十七條準用第二百條之限制,且解任事由不以起訴時任期內發生者為限。
前項第二款訴請法院裁判解任權,自保護機構知有解任事由時起,二年間不行使,或自解任事由發生時起,經過十年而消滅。
第三十四條至第三十六條規定,於保護機構依第一項規定提起訴訟、上訴或聲請保全程序、執行程序時,準用之。
公司因故終止上市、上櫃或興櫃者,保護機構就該公司於上市、上櫃或興櫃期間有第一項所定情事,仍有前三項規定之適用。
保護機構依第一項第一款規定提起訴訟時,就同一基礎事實應負賠償責任且有為公司管理事務及簽名之權之人,得合併起訴或為訴之追加;其職務關係消滅者,亦同。
公司之監察人、董事會或公司依第一項第一款規定提起訴訟時,保護機構為維護公司及股東權益,於該訴訟繫屬中得為參加,並準用民事訴訟法第五十六條第一項規定。
第一項第二款之董事或監察人,經法院裁判解任確定後,自裁判確定日起,三年內不得充任上市、上櫃或興櫃公司之董事、監察人及依公司法第二十七條第一項規定受指定代表行使職務之自然人,其已充任者,當然解任。
第一項第二款之解任裁判確定後,由主管機關函請公司登記主管機關辦理解任登記。
公司已依法設置審計委員會者,第一項及第六項所稱監察人,指審計委員會或其獨立董事成員。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.