Enforcement Rules of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act Article 29
According to Article 66 of the Act, central government agencies and their subordinate agencies (institutions), national schools, state-owned enterprises, and national cultural artifact custodian agencies (institutions)( hereafter collectively referred to as custodian agencies (institutions)) shall preliminarily sort and grade artifacts into national treasures, significant antiquities, and general antiquities in accordance with the standard specified in the Regulations Governing the Review of Classification, Designation, and Abolition of Antiquities, and report them to the central competent authority for review.When the custodian agencies (institutions) report to the central competent authority according to the preceding Paragraph, they shall submit a list of preliminarily-graded artifacts, indicating the name, quantity, age, material, picture and the classification of preliminarily grading of the artifacts. However, those artifacts whose ages are unknown are exempt from the indication.When the national cultural artifact custodian agencies (institutions) preliminarily grade an artifact as general antiquity in accordance with Paragraph 1, they may use their registration information of collections as the list of preliminarily-graded artifacts as specified in the preceding Paragraph.When reporting artifacts graded as national treasures or significant antiquities in Paragraph 1 to the central competent authority for review according to Article 68 of the Act, the custodian agencies (or institutions) shall submit the following material in the catalogs:1. Name, number, classification, and quantity of the artifacts;2. Comprehensive descriptions of the age, creator, size, material, technique, and other comprehensive descriptions as well as sources, origins, and pictures of the artifacts;3. Reasons for preliminary grading as national treasures and significant antiquities, criteria of grading, and related research materials; and4. Preservation condition, management and conservation planning, and other relevant matters.When reporting artifacts graded as general antiquities in Paragraph 1, the central competent authority may submit the review material to the competent authority at the municipality, county, or city where the custodian agencies (or institutions) are located for review; each competent authority of the municipality, county, or city may handle it according to Article 65 Paragraph 2 and Paragraph 3 of the Act.The custodian agencies (or institutions) may either on their own or assign related research institutions, professional entities or organizations to invite scholars and experts to establish a task force to conduct the review specified in Paragraph 1.
中文原文 文化資產保存法施行細則第29條
中央政府機關與附屬機關（構）、國立學校、國營事業及國立文物保管機關（構）（以下併稱保管機關（構））依本法第六十六條規定辦理文物暫行分級時，應依古物分級指定及廢止審查辦法所定基準，先予審定暫行分級為國寶、重要古物、一般古物，報中央主管機關備查。
前項備查，應檢具暫行分級古物清單，載明名稱、數量、年代、材質、圖片及暫行分級之級別。
但年代不明者，得免予載明。
國立文物保管機關（構），依第一項規定暫行分級為一般古物者，得以該保管機關（構）之藏品登錄資料，作為前項備查清單。
第一項暫行分級為國寶及重要古物者，保管機關（構）應另檢具下列列冊資料，報中央主管機關依本法第六十八條規定審查：
一、文物之名稱、編號、分類及數量。
二、綜合描述文物之年代、作者、尺寸、材質、技法與其他綜合描述及文物來源或出處、文物圖片。
三、暫行分級為國寶或重要古物之理由、分級基準及其相關研究資料。
四、保存狀況、管理維護規劃及其他相關事項。
第一項暫行分級為一般古物者，中央主管機關得將備查資料，送保管機關（構）所在地直轄市、縣（市）主管機關；各該直轄市、縣（市）主管機關得依本法第六十五條第二項及第三項規定辦理。
保管機關（構）為辦理第一項審定，得自行或委託相關研究機構、專業法人或團體，邀請學者專家組成小組為之。
前項備查，應檢具暫行分級古物清單，載明名稱、數量、年代、材質、圖片及暫行分級之級別。
但年代不明者，得免予載明。
國立文物保管機關（構），依第一項規定暫行分級為一般古物者，得以該保管機關（構）之藏品登錄資料，作為前項備查清單。
第一項暫行分級為國寶及重要古物者，保管機關（構）應另檢具下列列冊資料，報中央主管機關依本法第六十八條規定審查：
一、文物之名稱、編號、分類及數量。
二、綜合描述文物之年代、作者、尺寸、材質、技法與其他綜合描述及文物來源或出處、文物圖片。
三、暫行分級為國寶或重要古物之理由、分級基準及其相關研究資料。
四、保存狀況、管理維護規劃及其他相關事項。
第一項暫行分級為一般古物者，中央主管機關得將備查資料，送保管機關（構）所在地直轄市、縣（市）主管機關；各該直轄市、縣（市）主管機關得依本法第六十五條第二項及第三項規定辦理。
保管機關（構）為辦理第一項審定，得自行或委託相關研究機構、專業法人或團體，邀請學者專家組成小組為之。