Public Nuisance Dispute Mediation Act Article 41
Prior to approval of a mediation accord, an Agreement, or an arbitration decision by a court of law, the parties may, based on the mediation accord, the Agreement or the arbitration decision, apply to the court of law for provisional seizure or provisional disposition to secure compulsory enforcement or to avoid increased damages.When making the application prescribed in the foregoing paragraph, the parties may submit a mediation accord, an Agreement, or an arbitration decision as a substitute for cause for provisional seizure or provisional disposition. For those who use an arbitration decision as substitute for cause for provisional seizure or provisional disposition, no pledge is required.Where appropriate, the provisions of the Civil Procedures Act concerning provisional seizure and provisional disposition, not including Article 529 thereof, shall apply to the situations referred to in the foregoing two Paragraphs.Should the court of law disapprove a mediation accord, an Agreement, or an arbitration decision, the parties may apply to have the decree of provisional seizure or decree of provisional disposition revoked. The procedure referred to in the foregoing paragraph shall apply when a party brings a civil lawsuit in a court of law or when a party does not revoke a lawsuit.
中文原文 公害糾紛處理法第41條
當事人本於調處書、協議書或裁決書之請求,欲保全強制執行或避免損害之擴大者,得於調處書、協議書或裁決書經法院核定前,向法院聲請假扣押或假處分。
前項聲請,得以調處書、協議書或裁決書代替假扣押或假處分原因之釋明,其以裁決書代替原因之釋明者,免供擔保。
民事訴訟法有關假扣押或假處分之規定,除第五百二十九條外,於前二項情形準用之。
調處書、協議書或裁決書未經法院核定者,當事人得聲請法院撤銷假扣押或假處分之裁定。
當事人於裁決書正本送達後二十日內,就同一事件向法院提起民事訴訟或未撤回其訴者,亦同。
前項聲請,得以調處書、協議書或裁決書代替假扣押或假處分原因之釋明,其以裁決書代替原因之釋明者,免供擔保。
民事訴訟法有關假扣押或假處分之規定,除第五百二十九條外,於前二項情形準用之。
調處書、協議書或裁決書未經法院核定者,當事人得聲請法院撤銷假扣押或假處分之裁定。
當事人於裁決書正本送達後二十日內,就同一事件向法院提起民事訴訟或未撤回其訴者,亦同。