Institutional Long-Term Care Juridical Entities Act Article 42

If any of the following circumstances occurs, the competent authority may impose a fine of not less than NT$10,000 and not more than NT$50,000 and require the violating organization to undertake remedies within a specified period. Consecutive punishments may be imposed if no remedies are undertaken within the deadline.1. The remaining, newly established, or eliminated institutional long-term care juridical entities fails to apply for registration of change, establishment, or dissolution in accordance with Paragraph 5 of Article 20 upon a merger of institutional long-term care juridical entities.2. A long-term care foundation fails to file a report with the competent authority for recordation purposes in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article 23.3. The eleemosynary founder of a long-term care foundation or the executor of a will fails to file a report with the competent authority for recordation purposes in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article 23.4. A long-term care foundation fails to obtain approval from the competent authority in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 26, or fails to apply for registration of change or dissolution in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article 26.5. A long-term care corporation fails to file a report with the competent authority for recordation purposes in accordance with Subparagraph 1 of Article 30.6. A long-term care corporation fails to obtain approval from the competent authority in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 34, or fails to apply for registration of change or dissolution in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article 34.
中文原文 長期照顧服務機構法人條例第42條
有下列各款情形之一者,由主管機關處新臺幣一萬元以上五萬元以下罰鍰,並限期令其改善;屆期未改善者,並得按次處罰:
一、長照機構法人合併後,存續、新設或消滅法人未依第二十條第五項規定辦理變更、設立或解散登記。
二、長照機構財團法人未依第二十三條第二項規定報主管機關備查。
三、長照機構財團法人之捐助人或遺囑執行人未依第二十三條第三項規定報主管機關備查。
四、長照機構財團法人未依第二十六條第一項規定報主管機關許可,或未依第二十六條第二項規定辦理變更或解散登記。
五、長照機構社團法人未依第三十條第一款規定報主管機關備查。
六、長照機構社團法人未依第三十四條第一項規定報主管機關許可,或未依第三十四條第二項規定辦理變更或解散登記。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.