Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act Article 8-1

The administrative dispositions issued by the competent authority against internet service providers in accordance with the preceding article and Article 47 herein may be transmitted in electronic format over the internet to the electronic mail or electronic form publicly disclosed, designated, or registered for domain name by the internet service provider for notification, and such transmission shall be deemed as served.The electronic document mentioned in the preceding paragraph, upon being transmitted by the competent authority to the electronic mail or electronic form publicly disclosed, designated, or registered for domain name, by the internet service provider, shall take effect as having been duly served, notified, or made known in accordance with the law after one working day upon such transmission. However, the following circumstances are not subject to this time limit:1. When the electronic document has been transmitted but has not entered the electronic mail or electronic form publicly disclosed, designated, or registered for domain name, by the internet service provider.2. When the electronic document has entered the electronic mail or electronic form publicly disclosed, designated, or registered for domain name, by the internet service provider after one working day but the internet service provider provide an explanation that they cannot read it.3. When the internet service provider can prove that the electronic document entered the electronic mail or electronic form publicly disclosed, designated, or registered for domain name by it at an earlier or later time.In the event of a dispute regarding the circumstances described in the subparagraph 1 of the proviso in the preceding paragraph, it shall be proven by the competent authority. If the competent authority cannot provide proof, the electronic document shall be redelivered, notified, or made known in an appropriate manner.In the circumstances described in Subparagraph 2 of the proviso in Paragraph 2, the competent authority shall redeliver, notify, or make it known in an appropriate manner.In the circumstances described in Subparagraph 3 of the proviso in Paragraph 2, the effectiveness of delivery, notification, or making it known shall occur based on the earlier or later time point as proven by the internet operator, in accordance with the law.In any of the following circumstances, the competent authority may restrict the access:1. Where it is unable to ascertain the contact information of the internet service provider and, therefore, cannot effect the service referred to in Paragraph 1.2. Where it believes that the crime involved by the webpage information should be considered material and there should be an immediate need for disposition to prevent crime, expansion of hazards or avoid imminent danger.3. Where the internet service provider is suspected of involving in any of the offenses prescribed in Chapter IV for changing its domain name or any other methods after being restricted from the access.In order to help the competent authority execute the restricted access under the preceding paragraph and Article 47 herein, the competent authority for the administration of digital development affairs, competent authority for the administration of education-related affairs, competent authority for the regulation of telecommunications and broadcasting services, competent authority for the administration of police administrative affairs and internet access service provider shall provide assistance pursuant to laws.
中文原文 兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第8-1條
主管機關對網路業者依前條及第四十七條作成之行政處分,得以電子文件利用網際網路之方式,傳送至網路業者公開揭示、指定或網域註冊之電子郵件、電子表單,以為送達。
前項電子文件,由主管機關傳送至網路業者公開揭示、指定或網域註冊之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日,發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。
但有下列情形之一者,不在此限:
一、電子文件已傳送而未進入網路業者公開揭示、指定或網域註冊之電子郵件、電子表單。
二、電子文件已進入網路業者公開揭示、指定或網域註冊之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日,網路業者釋明其無法閱讀。
三、網路業者證明電子文件於較早或較晚之時點進入其公開揭示、指定或網域註冊之電子郵件、電子表單。
前項但書第一款情形有爭議時,由主管機關證明;主管機關不能證明者,應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第二款情形,主管機關應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第三款情形,依網路業者證明較早或較晚之時點,發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。
有下列情形之一者,主管機關得為限制接取:
一、無從知悉網路業者聯絡資訊,致無法為第一項之送達。
二、認網頁資料所涉犯罪嫌疑情節重大,為避免犯罪、危害擴大或避免急迫危險,而有即時處置之必要時。
三、網路業者經限制接取後,更換網域名稱或其他方法疑有第四章犯罪嫌疑情事。
主管機關為執行前項及第四十七條之限制接取,數位發展主管機關、教育主管機關、通訊傳播主管機關、法務主管機關、警政主管機關、網際網路接取服務提供者應依法協助執行。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.