Regulations of the Settlement Labor Insurance Disputes Article 22
If the BLI cannot present an opinion with the necessary documents on file by the deadline specified in paragraph 3 under Article 5, to the central competent authority, the review meeting may revoke the original examination and approval of BLI and return the case to BLI for a new round of decision-making for approval.For the applications of examination and review without reason, the committee shall turn down the application according to examination and approval.The original examination and approval of BLI relies on reason by although to be is improper, but takes other reason warrants, should apply for the consideration as unreasonably by.The application consideration has the reason; the committee shall rescind whole or part of original examination and approval of BLI and regard plot of the event to change the examination and approval directly or send back to BLI for another disciplinary action. But to the applicant indicated refuses to accept in the scope, can not have much detrimental examination and approval or disciplinary decision.
中文原文 勞工保險爭議事項審議辦法第22條
勞保局未依第五條第三項所定期間，提出意見書連同必要案卷，送中央主管機關者，審議會得審定撤銷勞保局原核定，發回勞保局另為核定。
申請審議無理由者，審議會應審定駁回。
勞保局原核定所憑理由雖屬不當，而以其他理由認為正當者，應以申請審議為無理由。
申請審議有理由者，審議會應審定撤銷勞保局原核定之全部或一部，並得視事件之情節，逕為變更之審定或發回勞保局另為核定。
但於申請人表示不服之範圍內，不得為更不利益之審定或核定。
申請審議無理由者，審議會應審定駁回。
勞保局原核定所憑理由雖屬不當，而以其他理由認為正當者，應以申請審議為無理由。
申請審議有理由者，審議會應審定撤銷勞保局原核定之全部或一部，並得視事件之情節，逕為變更之審定或發回勞保局另為核定。
但於申請人表示不服之範圍內，不得為更不利益之審定或核定。