Regulations on Aids for Legal Service and Living Expenses of Labor-Management Disputes Article 35

This English translation was last updated on 2025-12-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-08-18. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.

Workers who have any of the following circumstance may apply for the aid as established in Subparagraph 6 of Article 2 without undergoing the mediation procedure of the relevant authority:1.Cases filed on behalf of workers or job applicants with insufficient financial resources to seek adjudication of disputes resulting from unfair labor practices as specified in Article 35 of the Labor Union Act.2.Cases filed on behalf of a union with insufficient financial resources to seek adjudication of disputes resulting from unfair labor practices as specified in Article 35 of the Labor Union Act.No aid shall be provided to the applicant if the application of preceding paragraph has one of the following situations:1.The application been rejected by the Decision of Board on Unfair Labor Practices as stated in Paragraph 1 to Article 41 of the Act for the Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes.2.Upon review, the aid is obviously not necessary or the application is inconsistent with the objectives of the aids prescribed in the Act.
中文原文 勞資爭議法律及生活費用扶助辦法第35條
有下列情形之一,得不經主管機關調解程序,申請第二條第六款之扶助:
一、勞工或求職者因工會法第三十五條規定事由所生爭議,申請不當勞動行為裁決,且非屬有資力者。
二、工會因工會法第三十五條規定事由所生爭議,申請不當勞動行為裁決,且非屬有資力者。
前項扶助之申請,有下列情形之一者,不予扶助:
一、依勞資爭議處理法第四十一條第一項規定,經不當勞動行為裁決委員會作成不受理之決定。
二、經審查顯無扶助之必要或申請事項不符本法之扶助目的。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.