Regulations for Arbitration on Labor-Management Disputes Article 21
In case that the parties to the dispute make one of the following assertions that are considered as without a justifiable reason by the arbitrator with full authority or arbitration committee, the arbitration procedure can still be processed and decision be made:1. The agreement between the parties to arbitrate is not valid.2. The arbitration procedure is not legal.3. In violation of the agreement to arbitrate.4. The agreement to arbitrate is irrelevant to the dispute to be decided.5. The arbitrator with full authority or arbitration committee has no authority to arbitrate.6. Other reasons that may cause to file a lawsuit to revoke an arbitration decision in accordance with Paragraph 3 to Article 37 of the Act.
中文原文 勞資爭議仲裁辦法第21條
勞資爭議當事人有下列主張之一，仲裁人或仲裁委員會認其無理由時，仍得進行仲裁程序，並為判斷：
一、仲裁合意不成立。
二、仲裁程序不合法。
三、違反仲裁合意。
四、仲裁合意與應判斷之爭議無關。
五、仲裁人或仲裁委員欠缺仲裁權限。
六、其他依本法第三十七條第三項規定得提起撤銷仲裁判斷之訴之理由。
一、仲裁合意不成立。
二、仲裁程序不合法。
三、違反仲裁合意。
四、仲裁合意與應判斷之爭議無關。
五、仲裁人或仲裁委員欠缺仲裁權限。
六、其他依本法第三十七條第三項規定得提起撤銷仲裁判斷之訴之理由。