The Commodity Inspection Act Article 50

The BSMI shall promptly proceed with an investigation if there is a suspected violation of the provisions of this Act discovered while performing inspections or other relevant activities under the preceding Article.The investigation under the preceding Paragraph may be conducted using the following methods:1. Inquiring the obligatory inspection applicant, the distributor(s) of the commodity at issue, or other relevant parties, and requiring them to provide relevant documents or information;2. Dispatching personnel to the place(s) described in Paragraph 1 of Article 49 to conduct an investigation, taking samples of suspected nonconforming commodities, or requesting the obligatory inspection applicant or the distributor concerned to provide products of the same type or model as the commodity in question for further inspection; or3. If necessary, sealing up the suspected noncompliant commodities and placing them under the custody of the representative set forth in Subparagraph 1, or requesting the representative set forth in Subparagraph 1 to store the suspect commodity at a designated location.A record of the interview conducted during the investigation shall be made at the site of the investigation under the preceding Paragraph. The representative of the party being investigated, as set forth in Subparagraph 1 hereinabove, may be notified to make necessary statements while making such a record.If the investigation conducted under Paragraph 1 of this Article is impeded and such impediment cannot be eliminated without the assistance of the police, the BSMI may request the police authority to provide appropriate assistance as the situation requires.
中文原文 商品檢驗法第50條
標準檢驗局因前條檢查或其他情事,發現有違反本法規定之虞者,應即進行調查。
前項調查,得依下列方式進行:
一、向報驗義務人、經銷者或其他關係人查詢,並得要求提供相關文件或資料。
二、派員前往前條第一項之場所進行調查,並得對可疑違規商品取樣檢驗或請報驗義務人或經銷者提出與涉違規商品同型式之產品送驗。
三、必要時,得對可疑違規商品加以封存,交第一款之代表人具結保管或運存指定處所。
前項調查,應於調查場所或指定之處所作成訪問紀錄,並得通知第一款之代表人陳述意見。
為第一項調查時遇有障礙,非警察機關協助不足以排除時,得個案請求警察機關派員協助。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.