Patent Act Article 31
First-to-file principleWhere two or more patent applications are filed for the same invention, only the earliest application can be granted. The above shall not apply if the priority date claimed for the later-filed application is earlier than the filing date of the earlier application.If the filing date and the priority date referred to in the preceding paragraph are the same, the applicants shall be notified to reach an agreement with respect to the matter concerned. If such an agreement cannot be reached, none of the applications shall be granted. If the said patent applications are filed by the same applicant, the applicant shall be notified to select one patent application within a specified time period; failure to make a selection within the time period shall result in the rejection of all such patent applications.While the concerned applicants are in the process of reaching an agreement, the Specific Patent Agency shall require that these applicants report the results of the negotiation within an appropriate time period designated. If the said report is not provided within the specified time period, it shall be deemed that an agreement has not been reached.Where a patent application for an invention and a patent application for a utility model are filed separately in respect of the same creation, the provisions set forth in the preceding three paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis, except for the conditions stipulated in Article 32.
中文原文 專利法第31條
相同發明有二以上之專利申請案時,僅得就其最先申請者准予發明專利。
但後申請者所主張之優先權日早於先申請者之申請日者,不在此限。
前項申請日、優先權日為同日者,應通知申請人協議定之;協議不成時,均不予發明專利。
其申請人為同一人時,應通知申請人限期擇一申請;屆期未擇一申請者,均不予發明專利。
各申請人為協議時,專利專責機關應指定相當期間通知申請人申報協議結果;屆期未申報者,視為協議不成。
相同創作分別申請發明專利及新型專利者,除有第三十二條規定之情事外,準用前三項規定。
但後申請者所主張之優先權日早於先申請者之申請日者,不在此限。
前項申請日、優先權日為同日者,應通知申請人協議定之;協議不成時,均不予發明專利。
其申請人為同一人時,應通知申請人限期擇一申請;屆期未擇一申請者,均不予發明專利。
各申請人為協議時,專利專責機關應指定相當期間通知申請人申報協議結果;屆期未申報者,視為協議不成。
相同創作分別申請發明專利及新型專利者,除有第三十二條規定之情事外,準用前三項規定。