Patent Act Article 30
Priority claim based on earlier applicationAn applicant filing a subsequent patent application based on an earlier patent application for an invention or utility model in the ROC may make a priority claim with respect to the invention or utility model disclosed in the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) submitted for the earlier patent application. This provision shall not apply under any of the following conditions:1. where a period of twelve (12) months has elapsed after the filing date of the earlier patent application;2. where priority has been claimed in accordance with the provisions of Article 28 or this article in respect of the invention or utility model disclosed in the earlier patent application;3. where the earlier patent application is a divisional patent application prescribed under Paragraph 1 of Article 34 or Paragraph 1 of Article 107, or a converted patent application prescribed under Paragraph 1 of Article 108;4. where the earlier patent application is a patent application for an invention that has been published or has been finally and bindingly rejected;5. where the earlier patent application is a patent application for a utility model that has been published or has been finally and bindingly rejected; or6. where the earlier patent application has been withdrawn or dismissed.The earlier patent application referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to have been withdrawn upon an expiry of fifteen (15) months after its filing date.Priority claimed shall not be withdrawn upon an expiry of fifteen (15) months after the filing date of the earlier patent application.In the event that a subsequent patent application filed with a priority claim in accordance with Paragraph 1 is withdrawn within fifteen (15) months after the filing date of the earlier patent application, the priority claim thus made shall be deemed to have been withdrawn at the same time.Where an applicant claims two or more priorities for a patent application, the calculation of priority period shall be based on the earliest priority date.For a patent application filed with priority, examination of its patentability shall be based on the priority date.Where a priority claim is made in accordance with Paragraph 1, the filing date and the application number of the earlier patent application shall be declared at the time of filing. If such declaration is not made, the priority claim shall be deemed not to have been made.
中文原文 專利法第30條
申請人基於其在中華民國先申請之發明或新型專利案再提出專利之申請者,得就先申請案申請時說明書、申請專利範圍或圖式所載之發明或新型,主張優先權。
但有下列情事之一,不得主張之:
一、自先申請案申請日後已逾十二個月者。
二、先申請案中所記載之發明或新型已經依第二十八條或本條規定主張優先權者。
三、先申請案係第三十四條第一項或第一百零七條第一項規定之分割案,或第一百零八條第一項規定之改請案。
四、先申請案為發明,已經公告或不予專利審定確定者。
五、先申請案為新型,已經公告或不予專利處分確定者。
六、先申請案已經撤回或不受理者。
前項先申請案自其申請日後滿十五個月,視為撤回。
先申請案申請日後逾十五個月者,不得撤回優先權主張。
依第一項主張優先權之後申請案,於先申請案申請日後十五個月內撤回者,視為同時撤回優先權之主張。
申請人於一申請案中主張二項以上優先權時,其優先權期間之計算以最早之優先權日為準。
主張優先權者,其專利要件之審查,以優先權日為準。
依第一項主張優先權者,應於申請專利同時聲明先申請案之申請日及申請案號數;未聲明者,視為未主張優先權。
但有下列情事之一,不得主張之:
一、自先申請案申請日後已逾十二個月者。
二、先申請案中所記載之發明或新型已經依第二十八條或本條規定主張優先權者。
三、先申請案係第三十四條第一項或第一百零七條第一項規定之分割案,或第一百零八條第一項規定之改請案。
四、先申請案為發明,已經公告或不予專利審定確定者。
五、先申請案為新型,已經公告或不予專利處分確定者。
六、先申請案已經撤回或不受理者。
前項先申請案自其申請日後滿十五個月,視為撤回。
先申請案申請日後逾十五個月者,不得撤回優先權主張。
依第一項主張優先權之後申請案,於先申請案申請日後十五個月內撤回者,視為同時撤回優先權之主張。
申請人於一申請案中主張二項以上優先權時,其優先權期間之計算以最早之優先權日為準。
主張優先權者,其專利要件之審查,以優先權日為準。
依第一項主張優先權者,應於申請專利同時聲明先申請案之申請日及申請案號數;未聲明者,視為未主張優先權。