The Communication Security and Surveillance Act Article 15
The enforcement agency of communication surveillance cases as described in Article 5, Article 6, and Article 7, Paragraph 2 should, when the communication surveillance is over, state the name, permanent address or contact address of the person under surveillance, the Subparagraph under Article 11, Paragraph 1 that is applicable to the surveillance case and reference number of the authority issuing the interception warrant, the actual period of surveillance, whether communications information corresponding to the purpose of the surveillance has been obtained and the remedy procedure in the report to the prosecutor, or the authority overseeing national intelligence, whom in turn should report to the court, so that the person under surveillance may be notified. The report should also include the reasons if such a notification is deemed to be interfering with the purpose of the surveillance, or if the person should not be notified.If the report under the preceding Paragraph is not filed with the prosecutor and the authority overseeing national intelligence one month after the completion of the communications surveillance, the court shall notify the person under surveillance within 14 days, unless such notification is not possible.Upon receiving the report as described in the first Paragraph, the court should notify the person who was under surveillance, with the exception that if there is a concrete reason showing that such a notification is deemed to be interfering with the purpose of the surveillance, or if the person should not be notified.When the reasons for not notifying cease to exist, the enforcement agency should submit a report to the prosecutor, or the authority overseeing national intelligence, so that the court may supplement the notification. If the reason has not ceased to exist, the status of said case shall be continuously reported to the court every three months after submission of the report under the preceding Paragraph. If the report is not filed in time, the court shall notify the person under surveillance within 14 days.Contents of the report submitted by the enforcement agency shall be verified by the court and forwarded to the judicial associate officer for use in notifying the communications service user who was under surveillance, except if such a notification is not possible.The telecommunications service users under surveillance referred to in the preceding Paragraph include individual, institutions (agencies) or organizations.The preceding paragraphs 1 to 6 shall also apply mutatis mutandis to the situation of obtaining other people's network traffic in accordance with the provisions of this Act. However, the implementation of Paragraph 4 of Article 11-1 to obtain network traffic records shall be notified by the enforcement agency.
中文原文 通訊保障及監察法第15條
第五條、第六條及第七條第二項通訊監察案件之執行機關於監察通訊結束時,應即敘明受監察人之姓名、住所或居所、該監察案件之第十一條第一項各款及通訊監察書核發機關文號、實際監察期間、有無獲得監察目的之通訊資料及救濟程序報由檢察官、綜理國家情報工作機關陳報法院通知受監察人。
如認通知有妨害監察目的之虞或不能通知者,應一併陳報。
通訊監察結束後,檢察官、綜理國家情報工作機關逾一個月仍未為前項之陳報者,法院應於十四日內主動通知受監察人。
但不能通知者,不在此限。
法院對於第一項陳報,除有具體理由足認通知有妨害監察目的之虞或不能通知之情形外,應通知受監察人。
前項不通知之原因消滅後,執行機關應報由檢察官、綜理國家情報工作機關陳報法院補行通知。
原因未消滅者,應於前項陳報後每三個月向法院補行陳報未消滅之情形。
逾期未陳報者,法院應於十四日內主動通知受監察人。
關於執行機關陳報事項經法院審查後,交由司法事務官通知受監察人與該受監察之電信服務用戶。
但不能通知者,不在此限。
前項受監察之電信服務用戶包括個人、機關(構)、或團體等。
前六項規定,於依本法規定調取他人網路流量紀錄之情形,亦準用之。
但實施第十一條之一第四項調取網路流量紀錄之情形,應由執行機關通知。
如認通知有妨害監察目的之虞或不能通知者,應一併陳報。
通訊監察結束後,檢察官、綜理國家情報工作機關逾一個月仍未為前項之陳報者,法院應於十四日內主動通知受監察人。
但不能通知者,不在此限。
法院對於第一項陳報,除有具體理由足認通知有妨害監察目的之虞或不能通知之情形外,應通知受監察人。
前項不通知之原因消滅後,執行機關應報由檢察官、綜理國家情報工作機關陳報法院補行通知。
原因未消滅者,應於前項陳報後每三個月向法院補行陳報未消滅之情形。
逾期未陳報者,法院應於十四日內主動通知受監察人。
關於執行機關陳報事項經法院審查後,交由司法事務官通知受監察人與該受監察之電信服務用戶。
但不能通知者,不在此限。
前項受監察之電信服務用戶包括個人、機關(構)、或團體等。
前六項規定,於依本法規定調取他人網路流量紀錄之情形,亦準用之。
但實施第十一條之一第四項調取網路流量紀錄之情形,應由執行機關通知。