Attorney Regulation Act Article 93
The review meeting of the Attorney Disciplinary Committee shall be attended by more than two-thirds of the members as the quorum. However, any members who shall recuse themselves in any situations stipulated in Article 81 hereof shall not be counted in the attendance.The review shall be determined by the opinion that is agreed upon by a majority of the members.If the opinions under review are divided into three or more and none of such opinions wins a majority of the votes cast by the members, the votes won by the opinion that are most unfavorable to the attorney referred to disciplinary proceedings shall be counted as the vote won by the opinion that are second most unfavorable to such attorney, until a resolution may be made based on an opinion that wins the majority of the votes cast by the members.The review shall not be made public, and its opinions shall be recorded in the review book and be kept in strict confidence.
中文原文 律師法第93條
律師懲戒委員會之審議會議，應有委員三分之二以上之出席，始得開會。
但委員有第八十一條應迴避之事由者，不計入應出席人數。
審議應以過半數之意見決之。
審議之意見，分三說以上，均未達過半數時，以最不利於被付懲戒人之意見順次算入次不利於被付懲戒人之意見，至達過半數之意見為決議。
審議不公開，其意見應記入審議簿，並應嚴守秘密。
但委員有第八十一條應迴避之事由者，不計入應出席人數。
審議應以過半數之意見決之。
審議之意見，分三說以上，均未達過半數時，以最不利於被付懲戒人之意見順次算入次不利於被付懲戒人之意見，至達過半數之意見為決議。
審議不公開，其意見應記入審議簿，並應嚴守秘密。