Regulations Governing the Permission for Foreign Attorneys to Employ ROC Attorneys or to Partner with ROC Attorneys to Operate a Foreign Law Firm Article 5
If any one of the following conditions exists in the applications as described in the preceding two articles, the permission will not be granted:1.The application does not comply with the proviso in the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 123 of this Act;2.Required documents, pursuant to the provisions of preceding two articles, were not submitted with the permit application, the submitted documents lack details or compliance with regulations, and where required corrective action was not made within the prescribed deadline after receiving notification of such requirements, or where the correction made was incomplete pursuant to specified corrective items;3.There are sufficient facts to support the likelihood of violating the provisions of Article 11 of these regulations;4.The attorney who applies for a partnership or employment violates the provisions of Article 121 of this Act, and the circumstances are serious in nature;The Ministry of Justice shall make an approval/rejection decision within 60 days from the next day following the receipt of the application as described in the preceding two Articles. However, this provision does not apply to an application, where submitted documents lack details or compliance with regulations, to which a notification of corrective action within a prescribed deadline is sent.
中文原文 外國法事務律師僱用中華民國律師或與中華民國律師合夥經營法律事務所許可及管理辦法第5條
對於前二條之申請，有下列情形之一者，得不予許可：
一、不符合本法第一百二十三條第一項但書規定者。
二、未依前二條規定檢具必要文件、檢具之文件記載不詳或不符規定，經通知限期補正，逾期未補正或未依補正事項完全補正者。
三、有具體事實足認有違反本辦法第十一條規定之虞者。
四、申請合夥或僱用之外國法事務律師違反本法第一百二十一條之規定，情節重大者。
對於前二條之申請，法務部應自申請文件送達之次日起六十天內為准駁之決定。
但檢具之文件記載不詳或不符規定，經通知限期補正者，不在此限。
一、不符合本法第一百二十三條第一項但書規定者。
二、未依前二條規定檢具必要文件、檢具之文件記載不詳或不符規定，經通知限期補正，逾期未補正或未依補正事項完全補正者。
三、有具體事實足認有違反本辦法第十一條規定之虞者。
四、申請合夥或僱用之外國法事務律師違反本法第一百二十一條之規定，情節重大者。
對於前二條之申請，法務部應自申請文件送達之次日起六十天內為准駁之決定。
但檢具之文件記載不詳或不符規定，經通知限期補正者，不在此限。