Administrative Procedure Act Article 103
No opportunity for statement of opinions is required to be given by an administrative authority in any of the following circumstances:1. Where the disposition is one of the same kind rendered en masse;2. Where the situation is so pressing that offering of an opportunity to state opinions will obviously be against the public interest;3. Where limitation of the statutory period would make it obviously impossible to act accordingly even if an opportunity to present opinions were given;4. Where the actions are taken in the course of administrative enforcement proceedings;5. Where the facts based on which the administrative disposition is rendered are objectively clear enough to be firmly established;6. Where the degree and extent to which freedom or right is restrained are obviously minor to the extent that there is no need to hear in advance the opinions of the person subject to the disposition; 7. Where the person subject to the disposition is required by law to file an application to an administrative authority for review, opposition, reexamination, reconsideration or any other prior proceeding before an administrative appeal may be instituted; or 8. Where the disposition is a preventive junction or a ne exeat republica issued legally for the purpose of preventing the person subject to the disposition from concealing or transferring his assets or absconding from the nation.
中文原文 行政程序法第103條
有下列各款情形之一者,行政機關得不給予陳述意見之機會︰一、大量作成同種類之處分。
二、情況急迫,如予陳述意見之機會,顯然違背公益者。
三、受法定期間之限制,如予陳述意見之機會,顯然不能遵行者。
四、行政強制執行時所採取之各種處置。
五、行政處分所根據之事實,客觀上明白足以確認者。
六、限制自由或權利之內容及程度,顯屬輕微,而無事先聽取相對人意見之必要者。
七、相對人於提起訴願前依法律應向行政機關聲請再審查、異議、復查、重審或其他先行程序者。
八、為避免處分相對人隱匿、移轉財產或潛逃出境,依法律所為保全或限制出境之處分。
二、情況急迫,如予陳述意見之機會,顯然違背公益者。
三、受法定期間之限制,如予陳述意見之機會,顯然不能遵行者。
四、行政強制執行時所採取之各種處置。
五、行政處分所根據之事實,客觀上明白足以確認者。
六、限制自由或權利之內容及程度,顯屬輕微,而無事先聽取相對人意見之必要者。
七、相對人於提起訴願前依法律應向行政機關聲請再審查、異議、復查、重審或其他先行程序者。
八、為避免處分相對人隱匿、移轉財產或潛逃出境,依法律所為保全或限制出境之處分。