Primary and Junior High School Act Article 46

Schools shall establish a student appeal review committee, that is not permitted to have less than one fifth of its members who are parent representatives, and that shall include at least one expert or scholar in the field of law, education, rights and interests of children and youth, or psychology or counseling. The special municipality and county (city) competent authorities shall establish a student re-appeal review committee. More than half of its members shall be experts or scholars in the fields of law, education, rights and interest of children and youth, or psychology and counseling. The number of members of any gender is not permitted to constitute less than one third of the total number of members of a student appeals committees and student re-appeals committees. Regulations governing the scope of appeals and re-appeals, time limits, committee formation, investigation methods, appraisal methods, implementation of the results of appraisals, and other related matters shall be prescribed by the central competent authority.When a school handles disciplinary action or an appeal matter, and when a special municipality or county (city) competent authority handling a re-appeal matter, it shall do so maintaining the principles of objectivity, fairness, and professionalism, and give the person subject to disciplinary action or the appellant adequate opportunity to provide statements and respond to accusations.A school shall notify the person being punished in writing or by some other appropriate means. The school or special municipality or county (city) competent authority shall notify the appellant or re-appellant in writing of the decision made and the remedy procedures available if the person is not satisfied with the decision reached.If any original disciplinary action, measure or resolution was by nature an administrative disposition, any re-appeal decision shall be regarded as equivalent to an administrative appeal decision; if the appellant is dissatisfied with a re-appeal decision, the person may initiate administrative litigation in accordance with the law.
中文原文 國民教育法第46條
學校應設學生申訴評議委員會,其中家長代表不得少於五分之一,並應包括法律、教育、兒童及少年權利、心理或輔導專家學者至少一人;直轄市、縣(市)主管機關應設學生再申訴評議委員會,其中法律、教育、兒童及少年權利、心理或輔導專家學者人數應逾委員總數二分之一;學生申訴評議委員會及學生再申訴評議委員會,任一性別委員人數不得少於委員總數三分之一;其申訴、再申訴範圍、期限、委員會組成、調查方式、評議方式、評議結果之執行及其他相關事項之辦法,由中央主管機關定之。
學校受理懲處或申訴事件,直轄市、縣(市)主管機關受理再申訴事件時,應秉持客觀、公正、專業之原則,給予受懲處人或申訴人、再申訴人充分陳述意見及答辯之機會。
學校應以書面或其他適當方式告知受懲處人;學校及直轄市、縣(市)主管機關應以書面告知申訴人或再申訴人,各該評議決定及不服該決定之相關救濟程序。
原懲處、措施或決議性質屬行政處分者,其再申訴決定視同訴願決定;不服再申訴決定者,得依法提起行政訴訟。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.