Regulations Governing Prevention of Gender-Related Incidents on Campuses Article 30
In accordance with the principles of respecting professional judgment and avoiding repetitive questioning, the educational institution or competent authority with jurisdiction shall make a determination of the facts pertaining to a campus gender-related incident based on the investigation report of its gender committee.If the gender committee meets and reviews an investigation report and finds that a campus gender-related incident did occur and makes a recommendation, based on its determination of the facts, to the educational institution or competent authority to handle the matter by changing the status of the offender, the educational institution or competent authority shall notify the offender of the time limit in which to submit a written statement and attach a copy of the investigation report that was reviewed and approved at the gender committee meeting.If the offender referred to in the preceding paragraph does not submit a written statement within the time limit, it will be deemed as their forfeiting the opportunity to make a statement; if the offender makes a written statement, the gender committee shall convene another meeting to consider the offender's written statement. A reinvestigation is not permitted unless the gender committee discovers that there was some significant flaw in the investigation procedure or there is some new fact or new evidence that is sufficient to affect the outcome of the original investigation.When the responsible unit of the educational institution or competent authority that decides the disciplinary action is reviewing the disciplinary action to be taken, except in the circumstances stipulated in Paragraph 3 of Article 37 of the Act, it is not permitted to require the gender committee to reinvestigate the case and it is not permitted to conduct its own investigation.When the review off the disciplinary action referred to in the preceding paragraph, in accordance with the provisions of the associated regulations, shall give the offender an opportunity to make a statement of defense, the responsible unit of the educational institution or competent authority shall provide a copy of the investigation report reviewed and approved by the gender committee to the offender.Before making the decision on the disciplinary action referred to in Paragraph 4, the responsible unit shall notify the victim, or their legal representative or actual caregiver to submit a written or oral statement by a specified time. If an statement is made orally, the responsible unit shall create a printed transcript of the statement for the victim, their legal representative, or actual caregiver to sign or affix their personal seal to after the transcript has been read aloud to them or they have personally read it, and they have confirmed that it contains no errors. If a person fails to submit a written statement by the specified time, it will be deemed as their forfeiting the opportunity to make a statement. If a written statement is submitted, the unit authorized to decide the disciplinary action shall consider the written statement.
中文原文 校園性侵害性騷擾或性霸凌防治準則第30條
基於尊重專業判斷及避免重複詢問原則,事件管轄學校或機關對於與校園性別事件有關之事實認定,應依據性平會之調查報告。
性平會召開會議審議調查報告認定校園性別事件屬實,依其事實認定對學校或主管機關提出改變身分之處理建議者,由學校或主管機關檢附經性平會審議通過之調查報告,通知行為人限期提出書面陳述意見。
前項行為人不於期限內提出書面陳述意見者,視為放棄陳述之機會;有書面陳述意見者,性平會應再次召開會議審酌其書面陳述意見,除發現調查程序有重大瑕疵或有足以影響原調查認定之新事實、新證據情形外,不得重新調查。
學校或主管機關決定議處之權責單位,於審議議處時,除有本法第三十七條第三項所定之情形外,不得要求性平會重新調查,亦不得自行調查。
前項審議議處依相關法規應給予行為人陳述答辯意見時,應檢附經性平會審議通過之調查報告。
第四項議處決定前,權責單位應通知被害人、其法定代理人或實際照顧者限期以書面或言詞提出陳述意見;其以言詞為之者,權責單位應作成紀錄,經向被害人、其法定代理人或實際照顧者朗讀或使閱覽,確認其內容無誤後,由其簽名或蓋章;未於期限內提出書面陳述意見者,視為放棄陳述之機會;有書面陳述意見者,決定議處之權責單位應審酌其書面陳述意見。
性平會召開會議審議調查報告認定校園性別事件屬實,依其事實認定對學校或主管機關提出改變身分之處理建議者,由學校或主管機關檢附經性平會審議通過之調查報告,通知行為人限期提出書面陳述意見。
前項行為人不於期限內提出書面陳述意見者,視為放棄陳述之機會;有書面陳述意見者,性平會應再次召開會議審酌其書面陳述意見,除發現調查程序有重大瑕疵或有足以影響原調查認定之新事實、新證據情形外,不得重新調查。
學校或主管機關決定議處之權責單位,於審議議處時,除有本法第三十七條第三項所定之情形外,不得要求性平會重新調查,亦不得自行調查。
前項審議議處依相關法規應給予行為人陳述答辯意見時,應檢附經性平會審議通過之調查報告。
第四項議處決定前,權責單位應通知被害人、其法定代理人或實際照顧者限期以書面或言詞提出陳述意見;其以言詞為之者,權責單位應作成紀錄,經向被害人、其法定代理人或實際照顧者朗讀或使閱覽,確認其內容無誤後,由其簽名或蓋章;未於期限內提出書面陳述意見者,視為放棄陳述之機會;有書面陳述意見者,決定議處之權責單位應審酌其書面陳述意見。