Teachers’ Act Article 26

When an educational institution’s Teacher Evaluation Committee, Gender Equity Education Committee, or other relevant committee formed in accordance with law passes a resolution to dismiss a teacher or deny renewal of that teacher’s appointment in accordance with the provisions of Articles 14 to 16, or passes a resolution to impose a suspension on a teacher in accordance with the provisions of Article 18, unless other provisions of this Act apply, the educational institution shall report the matter to the Competent Authority for its approval within ten days from the day that the resolution was passed, and at the same time it shall notify the party or parties involved of its decision notify in writing of the reasons.If a teacher at a senior secondary or lower level school is involved in any situation referred to in the provisions of Articles 14 to 16, or of Article 18, and a Teacher Evaluation Committee at the school has not been convened in accordance with regulations, or has not deliberated the case, or has not passed a resolution, when the Competent Authority considers that the case might involve a breach of the law, it shall notify in writing of the reasons and return the case to the school to deliberate or reconsider the case; if the school then fails to deliberate or reconsider the case within a specified period, the Competent Authority may notify in writing of the reasons and refer the case directly to its Teachers’ Professional Review Committee to deliberate, and it may investigate which of the school’s associated personnel bear responsibility.The Teachers’ Professional Review Committee referred to in the preceding paragraph shall base its resolutions on the nature of each particular case, and the proportion of the committee’s members that must be in attendance at a meeting to deliberate a case and the proportion of votes that must be cast to pass a resolution shall be the same as the proportions required when a Teacher Evaluation Committee at a school deals with a matter. Its resolutions shall be regarded as equivalent to resolutions passed by a school’s Teacher Evaluation Committee.If a teacher at a junior college or an institution of higher education is involved in any situation referred to in Articles 14 to 16, or in Article 18, and a Teacher Evaluation Committee at the educational institution has not been convened in accordance with regulations, or has not deliberated, or passed a resolution regarding the situation, when the Competent Authority considers that the case might involve a breach of the law, it shall give a detailed explanation of its reason and return the case to the educational institution to deliberate or reconsider. If the case is not duly reviewed or reconsidered within a specified period, the Competent Authority may investigate which of the school’s associated personnel bear responsibility.If a teacher’s term of appointment expires while the person is still currently involved in disciplinary procedures, the educational institution shall temporarily continue their appointment.
中文原文 教師法第26條
學校教師評審委員會、性別平等教育委員會或依法組成之相關委員會依第十四條至第十六條規定作成教師解聘或不續聘之決議,或依第十八條規定作成教師終局停聘之決議後,除本法另有規定外,學校應自決議作成之日起十日內報主管機關核准,並同時以書面附理由通知當事人。
高級中等以下學校教師涉有第十四條至第十六條或第十八條規定之情形,學校教師評審委員會未依規定召開、審議或決議,主管機關認有違法之虞時,應敘明理由交回學校審議或復議;屆期未依法審議或復議者,主管機關得敘明理由逕行提交教師專業審查會審議,並得追究學校相關人員責任。
前項教師專業審查會之決議,應依該案件性質,以學校教師評審委員會原應經之委員出席比率及表決比率審議通過;其決議視同學校教師評審委員會之決議。
專科以上學校教師涉有第十四條至第十六條或第十八條規定之情形,學校教師評審委員會未依規定召開、審議或決議,主管機關認有違法之虞時,應敘明理由交回學校審議或復議;屆期未依法審議或復議者,主管機關得追究學校相關人員責任。
教師解聘、不續聘或終局停聘案尚在處理程序中,其聘約期限屆滿者,學校應予暫時繼續聘任。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.