Teachers’ Act Article 22
Within one month from the day that an educational institution where a teacher works becomes aware of a teacher’s being involved in any of the situations referred to in the following subparagraphs, after its Teacher Evaluation Committee has reviewed the matter and given approval, that educational institution shall, without having to report the matter to the Competent Authority and receive its approval, temporarily suspend the teacher for a period of up to six months and wait for the results of an investigation. When necessary, the period of suspension may be extended after the Teacher Evaluation Committee has reviewed the need for an extension and given approval. A maximum of two extensions is permitted and each extension is not permitted to exceed three months. If the investigation verifies that the circumstances did occur, after reporting the matter to the Competent Authority the educational institution shall suspend the teacher, without the disciplinary action having to be deliberated by the Teacher Evaluation Committee, until the Competent Authority has reviewed and approved the disciplinary action, and the educational institution then dismisses the teacher:1.Situations referred to in Subparagraphs 4 to 6 of Paragraph 1 of Article 14.2.Situations referred to in Subparagraph 1 or 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 15.If a teacher has been involved in any of the situations referred to in the following subparagraphs, and the educational institution where the teacher works considers that it is necessary for that teacher initially to be suspended and an investigation to be conducted, after its Teacher Evaluation Committee has reviewed the matter, and given approval, and without having to report the matter to the Competent Authority and receive its approval, the educational institution shall temporarily suspend the teacher for a period of up to three months and wait for the results of an investigation. When necessary, the period of suspension may be extended one time only after the Teacher Evaluation Committee has reviewed the need for an extension and given approval, and such an extension is not permitted to exceed three months. If the investigation verifies that the situation did occur, after it has reported the matter to the Competent Authority, the educational institution may suspend the teacher after its Teacher Evaluation Committee has deliberated and is in agreement, until the Competent Authority has reviewed and approved the disciplinary action, and the educational institution then dismisses the teacher:1.Situations referred to in Subparagraphs 7 to 11 of Paragraph 1 of Article 14.2.Situations referred to in Subparagraphs 3 to 5 of Paragraph 1 of Article 15.Decisions regarding the situations referred to in the preceding two paragraphs shall be made by the Teacher Evaluation Committee at a meeting attended by at least half of its members with at least half of the members present supporting the decision.
中文原文 教師法第22條
教師涉有下列各款情形之一者，服務學校應於知悉之日起一個月內經教師評審委員會審議通過後，免報主管機關核准，暫時予以停聘六個月以下，並靜候調查；必要時，得經教師評審委員會審議通過後，延長停聘期間二次，每次不得逾三個月。
經調查屬實者，於報主管機關後，至主管機關核准及學校解聘前，應予停聘，免經教師評審委員會審議：
一、第十四條第一項第四款至第六款情形。
二、第十五條第一項第一款或第二款情形。
教師涉有下列各款情形之一，服務學校認為有先行停聘進行調查之必要者，應經教師評審委員會審議通過，免報主管機關核准，暫時予以停聘三個月以下；必要時得經教師評審委員會審議通過後，延長停聘期間一次，且不得逾三個月。
經調查屬實者，於報主管機關後，至主管機關核准及學校解聘前，得經教師評審委員會審議通過後，予以停聘：
一、第十四條第一項第七款至第十一款情形。
二、第十五條第一項第三款至第五款情形。
前二項情形應經教師評審委員會委員二分之一以上出席及出席委員二分之一以上之審議通過。
經調查屬實者，於報主管機關後，至主管機關核准及學校解聘前，應予停聘，免經教師評審委員會審議：
一、第十四條第一項第四款至第六款情形。
二、第十五條第一項第一款或第二款情形。
教師涉有下列各款情形之一，服務學校認為有先行停聘進行調查之必要者，應經教師評審委員會審議通過，免報主管機關核准，暫時予以停聘三個月以下；必要時得經教師評審委員會審議通過後，延長停聘期間一次，且不得逾三個月。
經調查屬實者，於報主管機關後，至主管機關核准及學校解聘前，得經教師評審委員會審議通過後，予以停聘：
一、第十四條第一項第七款至第十一款情形。
二、第十五條第一項第三款至第五款情形。
前二項情形應經教師評審委員會委員二分之一以上出席及出席委員二分之一以上之審議通過。