Teachers’ Act Article 19
A person to whom any of the following situations pertains is not permitted to be appointed as a teacher; if such a person has already been appointed, the educational institution shall dismiss them:1.Any situation referred to in any of the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 14.2.Any situation referred to in any of the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 15 that occurred during the period of one to four years formally decided on.If any of the situations referred to in any of the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of the preceding article pertains to a teacher, during the suspension period of between six months and three years, another educational institution is not permitted to appoint them as a teacher; if such a person has already been appointed, the educational institution shall dismiss them.A teacher referred to in either of the two preceding paragraphs who has already been appointed is a person who has been reported as having a criminal record in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 20, shall be dismissed without the dismissal having to be deliberated by a Teacher Evaluation Committee and without it having to be reported to and approved by the Competent Authority, and the matter is not subject to the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 20 of University Act or the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 27 of Junior College Act. A teacher who has never been reported as having a criminal record in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 20 shall be dismissed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 14 or the provisions of Article 15.With the exception of any teacher who has committed a sexual assault; sexual harassment, or sexual bullying which constituted a breach of the pertinent ordinances and the circumstances are serious; and with the exception of any teacher who has caused severe physical or mental injury to one or more students as a result of subjecting them to corporal punishment or bullying, any teacher who before the June 27, 2013 amendments to this Act took effect was investigated and verified by the authorities concerned to have behaved inappropriately in a way that impairs the professional dignity and status of teachers , and was therefore dismissed or did not have their appointment renewed, may once again be appointed as a teacher after a period of at least four years from the date of effect of their dismissal or the non-renewal of their appointment.
中文原文 教師法第19條
有下列各款情形之一者，不得聘任為教師；已聘任者，應予以解聘：
一、有第十四條第一項各款情形之一。
二、有第十五條第一項各款情形之一，於該議決一年至四年期間。
有前條第一項情形者，於該停聘六個月至三年期間，其他學校不得聘任其為教師；已聘任者，應予以解聘。
前二項已聘任之教師屬依第二十條第一項規定通報有案者，免經教師評審委員會審議，並免報主管機關核准，予以解聘，不受大學法第二十條第一項及專科學校法第二十七條第一項規定之限制；非屬依第二十條第一項規定通報有案者，應依第十四條或第十五條規定予以解聘。
本法中華民國一百零二年六月二十七日修正之條文施行前，因行為不檢有損師道，經有關機關查證屬實而解聘或不續聘之教師，除屬性侵害行為；性騷擾、性霸凌行為、行為違反相關法令且情節重大；體罰或霸凌學生造成其身心嚴重侵害者外，於解聘或不續聘生效日起算逾四年者，得聘任為教師。
一、有第十四條第一項各款情形之一。
二、有第十五條第一項各款情形之一，於該議決一年至四年期間。
有前條第一項情形者，於該停聘六個月至三年期間，其他學校不得聘任其為教師；已聘任者，應予以解聘。
前二項已聘任之教師屬依第二十條第一項規定通報有案者，免經教師評審委員會審議，並免報主管機關核准，予以解聘，不受大學法第二十條第一項及專科學校法第二十七條第一項規定之限制；非屬依第二十條第一項規定通報有案者，應依第十四條或第十五條規定予以解聘。
本法中華民國一百零二年六月二十七日修正之條文施行前，因行為不檢有損師道，經有關機關查證屬實而解聘或不續聘之教師，除屬性侵害行為；性騷擾、性霸凌行為、行為違反相關法令且情節重大；體罰或霸凌學生造成其身心嚴重侵害者外，於解聘或不續聘生效日起算逾四年者，得聘任為教師。