Regulations Governing Accreditation of Teacher Qualifications at Junior Colleges and Institutions of Higher Education Article 44
This English translation was last updated on 2022-08-17, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If, during the period the Ministry is dealing with an accreditation review case, the applicant is reported or found to be involved in any one of the circumstances listed below, and the matter has then been duly considered and confirmed by the Ministry, the accreditation shall be unqualified. From the date that such a decision is made, no application for a teacher’s accreditation review will be accepted for the period stipulated in the subparagraph below that pertains to the circumstances; if the period in which no application will be accepted is five years or longer, the Ministry shall at the same time send each institution of higher education a copy of the details of the case.1. If the Teacher Accreditation Application and Resume Form or any co-author’s certification contains false information; if the representative work has not been truthfully documented as being co-authored and a co-author’s certification from each co-author was not submitted; if there are inappropriate citations; if materials have been republished without this having been indicated and authorized; if no indication is given that the content includes some already issued results or writing; or if any other matter constitutes a violation of academic ethics: from one to five years.2. The writings, creative works, performances, and/or technical reports contain plagiarized components, false material, altered material, or constitute fraud: from five to seven years.3. If any educational or professional credential documents, evidence of achievement, documentary evidence that academic writing will be issued by a journal within a fixed period, or any co-author’s certification has been forged, or altered, or any illegal or unscrupulous means have been used to influence a review of the applicant’s thesis : from seven to ten years.4. If an applicant either personally or through another person makes any requests or lobbies on the applicant’s behalf, or offers any bribe or enticement or makes any threat, or in any other way interferes with any reviewer or accreditation review procedure and the circumstances are serious: from one to two years.The associated review operations and determination criteria for each of the subparagraphs of the previous paragraph will be prescribed by the Ministry.If the applicant is involved in two or more of conditions of Paragraph 1 at the same time, they will be subject to the provisions of the highest period of inadmissibility in each case.
中文原文 專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法第44條
本部於受理教師資格審查案件期間，經檢舉或發現送審人涉及下列情事之一，並經本部審議確定者，其資格審定不合格，並自本部審議決定之日起，依各款所定期間，不受理其教師資格審定之申請；不受理期間為五年以上者，應同時副知各大專校院：
一、教師資格審查履歷表、合著人證明登載不實、代表作未確實填載為合著及繳交合著人證明、未適當引註、未註明而重複發表、未註明其部分內容為已發表之成果或著作或其他違反學術倫理情事者：一年至五年。
二、著作、作品、展演及技術報告有抄襲、造假、變造或舞弊情事：五年至七年。
三、學、經歷證件、成就證明、專門著作已為刊物接受將定期發表之證明、合著人證明為偽造、變造、以違法或不當手段影響論文之審查：七年至十年。
四、送審人或經由他人有請託、關說、利誘、威脅或其他干擾審查人或審查程序情節嚴重：一年至二年。
前項各款審查作業及認定基準，由本部定之。
送審人同時涉有第一項二種以上情事者，依各該不受理期間規定中最高期間之規定論處。
一、教師資格審查履歷表、合著人證明登載不實、代表作未確實填載為合著及繳交合著人證明、未適當引註、未註明而重複發表、未註明其部分內容為已發表之成果或著作或其他違反學術倫理情事者：一年至五年。
二、著作、作品、展演及技術報告有抄襲、造假、變造或舞弊情事：五年至七年。
三、學、經歷證件、成就證明、專門著作已為刊物接受將定期發表之證明、合著人證明為偽造、變造、以違法或不當手段影響論文之審查：七年至十年。
四、送審人或經由他人有請託、關說、利誘、威脅或其他干擾審查人或審查程序情節嚴重：一年至二年。
前項各款審查作業及認定基準，由本部定之。
送審人同時涉有第一項二種以上情事者，依各該不受理期間規定中最高期間之規定論處。