Regulations Governing Accreditation of Teacher Qualifications at Junior Colleges and Institutions of Higher Education Article 41
This English translation was last updated on 2022-08-17, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
An approved institution may formulate its own regulations regarding the following matters and not use the provisions of the related specified articles of these Regulations:1. Regarding the accreditation review criteria for technical reports: Article 15 and Article 16.2. Regarding creative works and evidence of achievement submitted for an accreditation review, apart from the stipulations detailed in Attachment 3 for the scope and categories of submitted materials, the material that must be submitted, and the review criteria: Article 17.3. Regarding ways in which academic writing is published: Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph 1 of Article 21 relates to the number of works submitted for review, the number of works to be added or replaced when reapplying after the previous teacher accreditation has been unqualified, and Paragraph 2 regarding the method of publication of specialized works.4. The percentage of reviewers' qualified review for external review as stipulated in Paragraph 3 of Article 31.5.If a teacher has ever worked as a professor in a full time position or a faculty member of academic research institutions at a foreign university, or at a university in Hong Kong or Macao, which satisfies the provisions of the appropriate recognition regulations, and they are in one of the categories listed below, some other procedure shall be formulated for reviewing their academic writing and conducting their accreditation review. The categories are:（1）A Nobel laureate or the recipient of an award of equivalent standing.（2）An academician of a national research institution.（3）A fellow of a major international learned society.（4）A person with outstanding achievements in an academic or professional field, equivalent to those of a person in one of the three categories above.An approved institution（including any institutions given partial approval）may formulate its own procedures and criteria for accreditation reviews which are more stringent than the procedures and criteria stipulated in these Regulations.Attachment 3 Scope and Criteria for Examination of Creative Works and Evidence of Achievement Submitted for Teacher Accreditation Reviews.pdf
中文原文 專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法第41條
認可學校得就下列事項，自行訂定規定，不適用本辦法之規定：
一、第十五條及第十六條有關技術報告之審查基準。
二、第十七條有關作品及成就證明，除附表三以外之送審範圍、類別、送繳資料及審查基準。
三、第二十一條第一項第三款有關送審著作件數、前經教師資格審定不合格，重新提出申請時，應增加或更換件數及第二項有關專門著作之出版方式。
四、第三十一條第三款所定外審結果合格之審查人審查及格比例。
五、就曾於符合採認辦法規定之國外大學或香港、澳門大學擔任專任教授或學術研究機構人員，並符合下列資格之教師，另定其送審著作審查及教師資格審查程序；其資格如下：
（一）諾貝爾獎或相當等級之得主。
（二）國家級研究院院士。
（三）國際重要學會會士。
（四）在其他相當於前三目資格之學術或專業領域著有傑出成就者。
認可學校（包括部分認可學校）得自行訂定較本辦法更嚴格之審查程序及基準。
一、第十五條及第十六條有關技術報告之審查基準。
二、第十七條有關作品及成就證明，除附表三以外之送審範圍、類別、送繳資料及審查基準。
三、第二十一條第一項第三款有關送審著作件數、前經教師資格審定不合格，重新提出申請時，應增加或更換件數及第二項有關專門著作之出版方式。
四、第三十一條第三款所定外審結果合格之審查人審查及格比例。
五、就曾於符合採認辦法規定之國外大學或香港、澳門大學擔任專任教授或學術研究機構人員，並符合下列資格之教師，另定其送審著作審查及教師資格審查程序；其資格如下：
（一）諾貝爾獎或相當等級之得主。
（二）國家級研究院院士。
（三）國際重要學會會士。
（四）在其他相當於前三目資格之學術或專業領域著有傑出成就者。
認可學校（包括部分認可學校）得自行訂定較本辦法更嚴格之審查程序及基準。