Regulations Governing Assessment of Profit-Seeking Enterprise Income Tax on Non-Arm's-Length Transfer Pricing Article 9
When profit-seeking enterprises and the collection authorities-in-charge determine the most appropriate Arm’s-length Method as set forth in Subparagraph 2 of Article 7 hereof, the determination shall be made based on the transaction types of Controlled Transactions applying Articles 10 to 13 respectively, and based on the following two criteria:1. Degree of comparability: The determination shall be made based on the degree of comparability between the profit-seeking enterprise and its Controlled Transactions and the comparables. The factors set forth in the Paragraph 1 of Article 8 shall be taken into consideration; in particular, special attention shall be drawn to the similarities of those specific factors set forth in Paragraph 2 of Article 14, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article 15, Paragraph 4 of Article 16, Paragraph 3 of Article 17, Paragraph 7 of Article 18 and Paragraph 2 of Article 19, and the specific assumptions set forth in Paragraph 2 of Article 19-1. The greater the degree of comparability, the higher will be the applicability of the methods.2. Quality of the data and assumptions: The determination shall be made based on the factors, including: the completeness, accuracy and adequacy of the data collected to identify the differences as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the possibility and appropriateness of making adjustment in accordance with the Paragraph 2 of Article 8 to eliminate such differences, and the reasonableness of the assumptions made. The better quality of the data and assumptions, the higher applicability of the methods will be.
中文原文 營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價查核準則第9條
營利事業與稽徵機關決定第七條第二款所定最適常規交易方法時,應依受控交易之交易類型,分別適用第十條至第十三條規定,並依下列規定決定之:
一、可比較程度:以營利事業及其所從事之受控交易與可比較對象間之可比較程度決定之。
其應考量第八條第一項規定之因素,尤應特別考量第十四條第二項、第十五條第二項至第四項、第十六條第四項、第十七條第三項、第十八條第七項、第十九條第二項所列應特別考量因素,及第十九條之一第二項所列應特別評估假設條件,比較其各該之相似程度,相似程度愈高者,其適用性愈高。
二、資料與假設之品質:以蒐集之資料足夠完整正確且能確認前款因素之差異、依第八條第二項規定進行調整以消除該等差異之可能性及適宜性、使用假設之合理性因素決定之,品質愈佳者,其適用性愈高。
一、可比較程度:以營利事業及其所從事之受控交易與可比較對象間之可比較程度決定之。
其應考量第八條第一項規定之因素,尤應特別考量第十四條第二項、第十五條第二項至第四項、第十六條第四項、第十七條第三項、第十八條第七項、第十九條第二項所列應特別考量因素,及第十九條之一第二項所列應特別評估假設條件,比較其各該之相似程度,相似程度愈高者,其適用性愈高。
二、資料與假設之品質:以蒐集之資料足夠完整正確且能確認前款因素之差異、依第八條第二項規定進行調整以消除該等差異之可能性及適宜性、使用假設之合理性因素決定之,品質愈佳者,其適用性愈高。