Military trial Article 198
The appealing military court should turn the appeal down after it considers the appeal as having no proper reasons. When it considers there are reasons for the appeal or the first trial of the case is inappropriate or against the law, it should revoke the original trial and announce a verdict to the case again. However, the case should be sent back to military court of the first trial when the first trial is informed as wrongly exercised, abolished from the suit, dismissed or withdrawn inappropriately.When the first trial is informed as wrongly exercised, abolished from the suit, dismissed or withdrawn inappropriately, if the appealing military court has the jurisdiction over first trial, it should process in the verdict of the first trial.The regulations of the first proviso don't suit to be used in the examination of bringing the prisoner to the court or the examination participated by the judges.
中文原文 軍事審判法第198條
上訴軍事法院認為上訴無理由者，應以判決駁回之。
認為上訴有理由，或上訴雖無理由，而原判不當或違法者，應將原審判決經上訴之部分撤銷，就該案件自為判決。
但因原審諭知管轄錯誤、免訴或不受理係不當而撤銷之者，得以判決將該案件發回原審軍事法院。
上訴軍事法院因原審判決未諭知管轄錯誤係不當而撤銷之者，如上訴軍事法院有初審管轄權，應為初審之判決。
第一項但書之規定，不適用於提審或蒞審。
認為上訴有理由，或上訴雖無理由，而原判不當或違法者，應將原審判決經上訴之部分撤銷，就該案件自為判決。
但因原審諭知管轄錯誤、免訴或不受理係不當而撤銷之者，得以判決將該案件發回原審軍事法院。
上訴軍事法院因原審判決未諭知管轄錯誤係不當而撤銷之者，如上訴軍事法院有初審管轄權，應為初審之判決。
第一項但書之規定，不適用於提審或蒞審。