Military trial Article 197
When one of the following situations is involved in the verdict, it is considered as violating the statute of the law:1. When the organization of the military court is against the law2. Military justice administrator who is judged to avoid the trial still gets involved.3. When the prohibition of open-trial is not regulated according to the law.4. Inappropriate jurisdiction considered by the military court.5. The accepted or unaccepted cases of the military court that are inappropriate. 6. The defendant is brought to trial before the trial day without special regulations. 7. In cases of applying defenders or appointed defenders, when the trial is brought without the presence of the defenders.8. Except for special regulations, those that are brought to trial without the statement of the military attorney general present. 9. Those that should stop or renew the trial according to the law but without stopping or renewing.10. Evidences that should be investigated before the trial day according to the regulation are without investigation. 11. When the defendant doesn't have the last chance to make a statement.12. Except for special regulations, matters that accept the requests without the verdict or those that have verdict but doesn't make any requests are considered as violating the law. 13. Military Chief Justice who participates in the verdict without participating in the trial. 14. When the verdict is without any reasons or the reasons are contradicted.15. The reasons of the verdict that are beneficial to the defendant or the debate intention is not adopted without recording.
中文原文 軍事審判法第197條
有下列情形之一者，其判決當然為違背法令︰一、軍事法院之組織不合法者。
二、依法律或裁判應迴避之軍事審判官參與審判者。
三、禁止審判公開非依法律之規定者。
四、軍事法院所認管轄之有無係不當者。
五、軍事法院受理案件或不受理案件係不當者。
六、除有特別規定外，被告未於審判期日到庭而逕行審判者。
七、依本法應用辯護人之案件或已經指定辯護人之案件，辯護人未經到庭辯護而逕行審判者。
八、除有特別規定外，未經軍事檢察官到庭陳述而為審判者。
九、依本法應停止或更新審判而未經停止或更新者。
十、依本法應於審判期日調查之證據，未予調查者。
十一、未與被告以最後陳述之機會者。
十二、除本法有特別規定外，已受請求之事項未予判決，或未受請求之事項予以判決者。
十三、未經參與審理之軍事審判官參與判決者。
十四、判決不載理由或所載理由矛盾者。
十五、判決理由對於被告有利之陳述或辯護意旨不予採納，而未經記載者。
二、依法律或裁判應迴避之軍事審判官參與審判者。
三、禁止審判公開非依法律之規定者。
四、軍事法院所認管轄之有無係不當者。
五、軍事法院受理案件或不受理案件係不當者。
六、除有特別規定外，被告未於審判期日到庭而逕行審判者。
七、依本法應用辯護人之案件或已經指定辯護人之案件，辯護人未經到庭辯護而逕行審判者。
八、除有特別規定外，未經軍事檢察官到庭陳述而為審判者。
九、依本法應停止或更新審判而未經停止或更新者。
十、依本法應於審判期日調查之證據，未予調查者。
十一、未與被告以最後陳述之機會者。
十二、除本法有特別規定外，已受請求之事項未予判決，或未受請求之事項予以判決者。
十三、未經參與審理之軍事審判官參與判決者。
十四、判決不載理由或所載理由矛盾者。
十五、判決理由對於被告有利之陳述或辯護意旨不予採納，而未經記載者。