Military trial Article 102

An accused may be detained after having been examined by a military judge and is strongly suspected of having committed an offense, and due to the existence of one of the following circumstances it is apparent that there will be difficulties in prosecution, trial, or execution of sentence unless the detention of the accused is ordered:1.He has absconded, or there are facts sufficient to justify an apprehension that he may abscond;2.There are facts sufficient to justify an apprehension that he may destroy, fabricate, or alter evidence, or conspire with another principal offender, a co-offender or witness;3.He has committed an offense punishable with the death penalty, life sentence, or a minimum punishment of sentence for no less than five years.4.There are facts sufficient to justify an apprehension that he may impair military security if not detained.At the time a military judge is making the examination in accordance with the provision of the preceding paragraph, the military prosecutor may be present and state the reason for applying detention order and present necessary evidence.The accused and his defense attorney shall be informed of the facts based to support the detention of an accused as specified in paragraph I of this article. The same shall be stated in the record.
中文原文 軍事審判法第102條
被告經軍事審判官訊問後,認為犯罪嫌疑重大,而有下列情形之一,非予羈押,顯難進行追訴、審判或執行者,得羈押之:
一、逃亡或有事實足認有逃亡之虞者。
二、有事實足認為有湮滅、偽造、變造證據或勾串其他正犯、共犯或證人之虞者。
三、所犯為死刑、無期徒刑或最輕本刑為五年以上有期徒刑之罪者。
四、有事實足認非予羈押即有妨害軍事安全之虞者。
軍事審判官為前項之訊問時,軍事檢察官得到場陳述聲請羈押之理由及提出必要之證據。
第一項各款所依據之事實,應告知被告及其辯護人,並記載於筆錄。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.