Public Interest Whistleblower Protection Act Article 9
A civil servant subjected to adverse treatment under Article 8, Paragraph 2, Subparagraphs 1 to 4 shall apply for an administrative remedy in accordance with the legal procedures applicable to their original identity relationship. The right to claim compensation under Subparagraphs 3 and 4 of Paragraph 3 of the same article shall commence from the date on which the government agency (institution) renders a decision deeming the restoration of the original state or the administrative remedy to be justified in accordance with the claim under Paragraph 2. The right to claim compensation arising from adverse treatment as provided in Article 8, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 5 shall be extinguished if not exercised within 6 months from the date the claimant becomes aware of the occurrence of the fact. The same shall apply if more than 2 years have passed since the occurrence of the damage.If a civil servant, in the process of anappeal, reappeal, review, administrative appeal, evaluation, disciplinary action, administrative litigation, or other personnel administrative remedy procedures, claims that they have performed any of the acts listed in Article 8, Paragraph 1 and have been transferred or subjected to adverse treatment, such claims shall be investigated before other matters. The determination of the validity of the claims shall be based on the results of the investigation.If a civil servant subjected to adverse treatment claims that their transfer or disciplinary action resulted from performing acts specified in Article 8, Paragraph 1, and such claims are determined to be valid, leading to a final ruling of no disciplinary action upon review by the Disciplinary Court, they may apply for compensation as provided in Article 8, Paragraph 3, Subparagraphs 3 and 4. The provisions of the statute of limitations in Paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis.The exercise of the claims referred to in Paragraph 1 and the preceding paragraph shall not prejudice any rights exercised under the Civil Code, the State Compensation Law, or other laws.
中文原文 公益揭弊者保護法第9條
具公務員身分之人因受第八條第二項第一款至第四款不利措施者,應依其原有身分關係適用之法律程序提起行政救濟,所生同條第三項第三款及第四款之賠償請求權,自政府機關(構)依第二項主張作成回復原狀、行政救濟為有理由之決定確定之日起;因第八條第二項第五款不利措施所生之賠償請求權,自知悉事實發生之日起,六個月間不行使而消滅;自損害發生時起,逾二年者亦同。
公務員於申訴、再申訴、復審、訴願、評鑑、懲戒、行政訴訟或其他人事行政行為救濟程序中,主張其有第八條第一項各款行為者,而遭移送或受有不利措施者,應先於其他事證而為調查,並依調查結果而為成立或不成立之認定。
具公務員身分之受不利措施者主張其因有第八條第一項各款之行為而遭移送懲戒,經懲戒法院審理後,認定其依前項之主張成立並為不受懲戒之判決確定者,亦得請求第八條第三項第三款及第四款之賠償,並準用第一項時效之規定。
第一項及前項請求權之行使,不妨礙依民法、國家賠償法或其他法律所得行使之權利。
公務員於申訴、再申訴、復審、訴願、評鑑、懲戒、行政訴訟或其他人事行政行為救濟程序中,主張其有第八條第一項各款行為者,而遭移送或受有不利措施者,應先於其他事證而為調查,並依調查結果而為成立或不成立之認定。
具公務員身分之受不利措施者主張其因有第八條第一項各款之行為而遭移送懲戒,經懲戒法院審理後,認定其依前項之主張成立並為不受懲戒之判決確定者,亦得請求第八條第三項第三款及第四款之賠償,並準用第一項時效之規定。
第一項及前項請求權之行使,不妨礙依民法、國家賠償法或其他法律所得行使之權利。