Innovation Act for Industry-Academia Collaboration and Talent Cultivation in National Key Fields Article 46
If the management committee determines that the key research institute’s operational planning and/or performance is poor, the situation shall be handled in accordance with one of the following provisions:1.The management committee shall order the key research institute to put forward a plan for improvement within a specified time limit and the key research institute shall implement the plan upon deliberation and approval by the management committee and submit it to the supervisory committee for reference.2.If the key research institute fails to put forward a plan for improvement in accordance with the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or if the management committee disapprove the plan after deliberation over it, the management committee may put forward a plan for improvement and order the key research institute to implement it and the management committee shall submit the plan to the supervisory committee for reference.If the supervisory committee determines that the key research institute’s operating performance is poor after deliberating over the key research institute’s performance report, the key research institute shall draw up a plan for operation improvement within six months that addresses each operations item and submit the plan to the management committee for deliberation. If the management committee approves the plan, the key research institute shall submit it to the university council for reference.The key research institute shall report its handling of the plan for operation improvement referred to in the preceding paragraph to the supervisory committee on a regular basis; if the supervisory committee determines that the improvements made are not effective and the key research institute must be closed down, the key research institute shall put forward a closure plan within three months. The plan shall be deliberated over by the management committee and the supervisory committee, then presented to the university council for approval, after which the national university shall submit the plan to the competent authority for approval, and if the plan is approved, the national university shall implement it. If the management committee is negligent in its handling of the situation, the supervisory committee shall put forward a closure plan then present it to the university council for approval, after which the national university shall submit the plan to the competent authority for approval, and if the plan is approved, the national university shall implement it.
中文原文 國家重點領域產學合作及人才培育創新條例第46條
研究學院經管理會認定經營規劃及績效不佳者,依下列規定之一辦理:
一、管理會令研究學院限期提出改善計畫,經管理會審議通過後執行,並報監督會備查。
二、研究學院未依前款規定提出改善計畫或改善計畫未獲管理會審議通過,管理會得逕提出改善計畫,令研究學院執行,並報監督會備查。
研究學院之績效報告書經監督會審議後,認定其經營績效不佳者,研究學院應於六個月內擬訂各項經營改善計畫,報管理會審議,經監督會通過後,送校務會議備查。
前項經營改善計畫之辦理情形,研究學院應定期向監督會報告;經監督會認定改善無效且須停辦者,研究學院應於三個月內提出停辦計畫,經管理會及監督會審議,送校務會議通過,由國立大學報主管機關核定後執行;管理會怠於處理時,應由監督會提出停辦計畫,送校務會議通過,由國立大學報主管機關核定後執行。
一、管理會令研究學院限期提出改善計畫,經管理會審議通過後執行,並報監督會備查。
二、研究學院未依前款規定提出改善計畫或改善計畫未獲管理會審議通過,管理會得逕提出改善計畫,令研究學院執行,並報監督會備查。
研究學院之績效報告書經監督會審議後,認定其經營績效不佳者,研究學院應於六個月內擬訂各項經營改善計畫,報管理會審議,經監督會通過後,送校務會議備查。
前項經營改善計畫之辦理情形,研究學院應定期向監督會報告;經監督會認定改善無效且須停辦者,研究學院應於三個月內提出停辦計畫,經管理會及監督會審議,送校務會議通過,由國立大學報主管機關核定後執行;管理會怠於處理時,應由監督會提出停辦計畫,送校務會議通過,由國立大學報主管機關核定後執行。