The Servicemember Relief Act Article 56
A legal notice should be remarked in the petition decision that if the petitioner disagrees with the petition decision, it may, within the 2-month period stipulated in Paragraph 1 of the preceding Article, initiate an administrative litigation in the Service Tribunal with the juridical boundaries where the original disposition agency or the Protection Committee conducting consolidation eats.The Protection Committee shall rectify with a notice if the period for administrative litigation in the legal notice stipulated in the preceding Paragraph is erroneous, the period shall recommence from the next day of the date on which the rectification notice is served.Whereas the person fails to initiate an administrative litigation due to the failure of the Protection Committee to remark a legal notice as stipulated in Paragraph 1 of this Article, or its erroneous legal notice and failure to rectify with a notice, if the administrative litigation is initiated within 1 year from the next day of the date on which the petition decision is served, it is deemed as if the initiation of the administrative litigation falls within the statutory period.
中文原文 軍人權益事件處理法第56條
復審決定書應附記,如不服決定,得於前條第一項所定二個月期間內,向原處分機關或合併審議之權保會所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟。
前項提起行政訴訟之期間附記錯誤時,應由權保會通知更正之,並自更正通知送達之次日起,計算法定期間。
權保會未依第一項規定附記期間,或附記錯誤而未依前項規定通知更正,致原提起行政訴訟之人遲誤行政訴訟期間者,如於復審決定書送達之次日起一年內提起行政訴訟,視為於法定期間內提起。
前項提起行政訴訟之期間附記錯誤時,應由權保會通知更正之,並自更正通知送達之次日起,計算法定期間。
權保會未依第一項規定附記期間,或附記錯誤而未依前項規定通知更正,致原提起行政訴訟之人遲誤行政訴訟期間者,如於復審決定書送達之次日起一年內提起行政訴訟,視為於法定期間內提起。