The Servicemember Relief Act Article 11
The SRPC member or clerk shall recuse itself from a petition or re-appeal matter in any of the following circumstances:1. Where its spouse, former spouse, any of its relatives by blood within the fourth degree or relative by marriage within the third degree, head of a family or members of the family, or any person having previously such relationship with it, is the petitioner or re-appellant;2. Where it has been involved in the administrative investigation, administrative disposition, management measure, or appealing procedure of the pending matter;3. Where it is or was an agent or assistant of the party in the pending matter;4. Where it was a witness or expert witness in the pending matter;5. Where it has a conflict of interest in the pending case.Where recusal of the SRPC member or clerk is required but the individual fails to recuse itself or there is sufficient evidence for determining that the individual may have prejudice while executing its duties, the party concerned may state the causes and file a motion to the Protection Committee requesting the recusal of such member or clerk.The motion in the preceding paragraph shall enumerate the grounds and facts with convincing details. The SRPC member or clerk requested to be removed may propose its opinions vis-a-vis the motion.In the case that an SRPC member’s recusal is motioned, the adjudication shall stay before the Protection Committee’s grant or dismissal of the motion. Nonetheless, provided that there is an emergency situation the necessary actions shall be taken accordingly.The SRPC members are not allowed to take part in the procedure of granting or dismissing the motion for recusal.In the case where the SRPC member or clerk fails to recuse itself in the circumstances prescribed in the preceding paragraph and is not requested to be recused by the petitioner or re-appellant, the Protection Committee shall order the recusal of such member or clerk ex officio.
中文原文 軍人權益事件處理法第11條
權保委員或書記官於復審或再申訴所涉爭議事件，有下列情形之一者，應自行迴避：
一、與提起復審或再申訴之人有配偶、四親等內血親、三親等內姻親、家長、家屬或曾有此關係。
二、曾參與該事件之行政調查、行政處分、管理措施或申訴程序。
三、現為或曾為該事件當事人之代理人、輔佐人。
四、於該事件，曾為證人、鑑定人。
五、與該事件有法律上利害關係。
權保委員或書記官有前項所定情形之一，應自行迴避而不迴避，或有具體事實，足認其執行職務有偏頗之虞者，復審人或再申訴人得備具書狀敘明理由，向權保會申請迴避。
前項申請，應舉其原因及事實，並應為適當之釋明；被申請迴避之人，對於該申請得提出意見書。
權保委員被申請迴避者，於權保會就該申請事件為准許或駁回之決定前，應停止審議程序。
但有急迫情形，仍應為必要處理。
前項決定，被申請迴避之權保委員不得參與。
權保委員或書記官有第一項所定情形之一不自行迴避，而未經復審人或再申訴人申請迴避者，應由該權保會依職權命其迴避。
一、與提起復審或再申訴之人有配偶、四親等內血親、三親等內姻親、家長、家屬或曾有此關係。
二、曾參與該事件之行政調查、行政處分、管理措施或申訴程序。
三、現為或曾為該事件當事人之代理人、輔佐人。
四、於該事件，曾為證人、鑑定人。
五、與該事件有法律上利害關係。
權保委員或書記官有前項所定情形之一，應自行迴避而不迴避，或有具體事實，足認其執行職務有偏頗之虞者，復審人或再申訴人得備具書狀敘明理由，向權保會申請迴避。
前項申請，應舉其原因及事實，並應為適當之釋明；被申請迴避之人，對於該申請得提出意見書。
權保委員被申請迴避者，於權保會就該申請事件為准許或駁回之決定前，應停止審議程序。
但有急迫情形，仍應為必要處理。
前項決定，被申請迴避之權保委員不得參與。
權保委員或書記官有第一項所定情形之一不自行迴避，而未經復審人或再申訴人申請迴避者，應由該權保會依職權命其迴避。