Act to Restore Victim's Rights Infringed by Illegal Acts of the State During the Period of Authoritarian Rule Article 13

Where the target property in question is involved in a litigation for reasons of the implementation of provisions of the second part of Paragraph 1, Article 11 or Paragraph 1 of Article 12, or there is a situation in which a prior return of monetary compensation or reparation shall be made in accordance with provisions of Paragraph 2 or Paragraph 5 of Article 20, the applicant concerned may apply for monetary compensation instead of the return of the target property in question. The Restoration of Rights Foundation may not dismiss such an application without justifiable cause and shall revoke its original decision of ordering the return of the target property in question.Where the target property in question is involved in a litigation for reasons of the implementation of provisions of the second part of Paragraph 1, Article 11 or Paragraph 1 of Article 12 and the applicant concerned files an application for monetary compensation, the Restoration of Rights Foundation, after granting the monetary compensation in question, shall order the third party concerned to render a payment to the Restoration of Rights Foundation within a specific time period at the amount of the monetary compensation in question deducted by the repayments for the acquisition of the property by the third party concerned.A party that is obligated to return the target property in question that has paid for the expenses incurred by the use, alteration of the target property in question, or by the increase of its value, may apply to the Restoration of Rights Foundation for a reparation of the payment he/she had made. The said reparation shall not exceed the current value of the target property in question.Where the party that is obligated to return the target property in question is a public legal entity, Paragraph 3 of this Article shall not be applicable.