Civil Service Protection Act Article 7
This English translation was last updated on 2022-06-22, but the Chinese text was amended on 2025-07-09. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
Any person reviewing a Protection Case shall withdraw from the cases in any of the following circumstances:1.Where his/her spouse, former spouse, any of his/her relatives by blood within the fourth degree or relative by marriage within the third degree, head of a family or members of the family, or any person having previously such relationship with him/her, is a civil servant filing the Protection Case;2.Where he/she participated in handling or appealing procedures of any administrative action, management measures or working conditions;3.Where he/she is or was an agent or assistant of the party filing the Protection Case;4.He/she was a witness or expert witness in the Protection Case;5.Where he/she has legal interest in the Protection Case.The withdrawal in the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the person assisting the handling of the Protection Case.Anyone in the preceding two paragraphs having knowledge of obligation to, but fail to, withdraw himself/herself in reviewing the protection Cases shall be referred for discipline pursuant to relevant laws and regulations.The withdrawal restriction in Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1 shall not be applicable to any relevant government agency’sdeputy holding the CSPTC commissionership concurrently. However, he/she shall not have voting rights in the decision of the Protection Case involving his/her government agency.The petitioner or re-appellant may submit to the CSPTC a pleading stating the reasons to request for withdrawal.
中文原文 公務人員保障法第7條
審理保障事件之人員有下列各款情形之一者,應自行迴避:
一、與提起保障事件之公務人員有配偶、前配偶、四親等內血親、三親等內姻親、家長、家屬或曾有此關係者。
二、曾參與該保障事件之行政處分、管理措施、有關工作條件之處置或申訴程序者。
三、現為或曾為該保障事件當事人之代理人、輔佐人者。
四、於該保障事件,曾為證人、鑑定人者。
五、與該保障事件有法律上利害關係者。
前項迴避,於協助辦理保障事件人員準用之。
前二項人員明知應迴避而不迴避者,應依法移送懲戒。
有關機關副首長兼任保訓會之委員者,不受第一項第二款迴避規定限制。
但涉及本機關有關保障事件之決定,無表決權。
復審人、再申訴人亦得備具書狀敘明理由向保訓會申請迴避。
一、與提起保障事件之公務人員有配偶、前配偶、四親等內血親、三親等內姻親、家長、家屬或曾有此關係者。
二、曾參與該保障事件之行政處分、管理措施、有關工作條件之處置或申訴程序者。
三、現為或曾為該保障事件當事人之代理人、輔佐人者。
四、於該保障事件,曾為證人、鑑定人者。
五、與該保障事件有法律上利害關係者。
前項迴避,於協助辦理保障事件人員準用之。
前二項人員明知應迴避而不迴避者,應依法移送懲戒。
有關機關副首長兼任保訓會之委員者,不受第一項第二款迴避規定限制。
但涉及本機關有關保障事件之決定,無表決權。
復審人、再申訴人亦得備具書狀敘明理由向保訓會申請迴避。