Civil Service Protection Act Article 61
This English translation was last updated on 2022-06-22, but the Chinese text was amended on 2025-07-09. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
Whereas one of the following clauses is met in a deliberation case, the CSPTC shall make a decision of case not entertained:1.A petition pleading is not in compliant with required form and process and not amendable, or is not amended, if amendable, after the expiration of a specific period designated to amend by notice;2.A petition is filed after the expiration of the period stipulated by this Act, or its pleading is not supplemented in the specific period pursuant to the exceptional section of Article 46;3.A petitioner without legal capacity to conduct petition without the representation of his/her legal representative, provided that a notification to amend has been given but failed to do so after the expiration of the specific period to amend;4.A petitioner is ineligible for filing the petition;5.The administrative action is no longer existed;6.The same petition is repeatedly filed against a conclusive or withdrawn petition; or7.A petition is filed against the matters beyond the scope of the petition remedies.While a petitioner has recoverable legal interest arising from the revoking of the administrative action, the CSPTC shall not make a decision of case not entertained even under the circumstance stipulated in Subparagraph 5 of the preceding paragraph.While a civil servant mistakenly files a petition for deliberation which should be an appeal or re-appeal case in the Subparagraph 7 of Paragraph 1, the CSPTC shall transfer it to the agency with jurisdiction of appeal to handle in accordance with appealing procedure and notify the civil servant, and shall not directly make a decision of case not entertained.
中文原文 公務人員保障法第61條
復審事件有下列各款情形之一者，應為不受理決定：
一、復審書不合法定程式不能補正或經酌定相當期間通知補正逾期不補正者。
二、提起復審逾法定期間或未於第四十六條但書所定期間，補送復審書者。
三、復審人無復審能力而未由法定代理人代為復審行為，經通知補正逾期不補正者。
四、復審人不適格者。
五、行政處分已不存在者。
六、對已決定或已撤回之復審事件重行提起復審者。
七、對不屬復審救濟範圍內之事項，提起復審者。
前項第五款情形，如復審人因該處分之撤銷而有可回復之法律上利益時，不得為不受理之決定。
第一項第七款情形，如屬應提起申訴、再申訴事項，公務人員誤提復審者，保訓會應移轉申訴受理機關依申訴程序處理，並通知該公務人員，不得逕為不受理決定。
一、復審書不合法定程式不能補正或經酌定相當期間通知補正逾期不補正者。
二、提起復審逾法定期間或未於第四十六條但書所定期間，補送復審書者。
三、復審人無復審能力而未由法定代理人代為復審行為，經通知補正逾期不補正者。
四、復審人不適格者。
五、行政處分已不存在者。
六、對已決定或已撤回之復審事件重行提起復審者。
七、對不屬復審救濟範圍內之事項，提起復審者。
前項第五款情形，如復審人因該處分之撤銷而有可回復之法律上利益時，不得為不受理之決定。
第一項第七款情形，如屬應提起申訴、再申訴事項，公務人員誤提復審者，保訓會應移轉申訴受理機關依申訴程序處理，並通知該公務人員，不得逕為不受理決定。