Judges Act Article 96

In the event a prosecutor under supervision committed material acts stipulated under Paragraph 2 of the preceding article, the individual having the supervision authority under Article 94 may, in the name of the affiliated agency, request the Prosecutor Evaluation Committee to initiate an evaluation, or transfer the matter to the Ministry of Justice for disposition, in which case Article 51, Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall apply, mutatis mutandis. .The violation is deemed to be material if a prosecutor should recommit the matters stipulated under Section 2 of the preceding article within one year since the issuance of the warning, or have accumulated three warnings.
中文原文 法官法第96條
被監督之檢察官有前條第二款之情事,情節重大者,第九十四條所定監督權人得以所屬機關名義,請求檢察官評鑑委員會評鑑,或移由法務部準用第五十一條第二項、第三項規定辦理。
被監督之檢察官有前條第二款之情事,經警告後一年內再犯,或經警告累計達三次者,視同情節重大。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.